Robert M. Lust

92 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Robert M. Lust
Comparison fields: 5 of 130
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 461
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 300
  • Developmental Neuroscience 80
  • Physiology 444
  • Clinical Biochemistry 104
Replace Pamela A. Lucchesi with:
Pamela A. Lucchesi United States
Susanne Rohrbach Germany
Steve Leu Taiwan
Christophe Beauloye Belgium
Loren E. Wold United States
Naoharu Iwai Japan
Mahmood S. Mozaffari United States
Quan Fang China
Pei‐Hsun Sung Taiwan
Chikara Goto Japan
Robert M. Lust relative to Pamela A. Lucchesi United States Pamela A. Lucchesi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.7×
Pamela A. Lucchesi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert M. Lust

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert M. Lust's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert M. Lust with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert M. Lust more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert M. Lust

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert M. Lust. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert M. Lust. The network helps show where Robert M. Lust may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert M. Lust, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert M. Lust Line = papers co-authored together Robert M. Lust links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 92 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009275
2 1997189
3 2019131
4 2007120
5 2006115
6 200691
7 201290
8 201081
9 201261
10 200758
11 200155
12 200750
13 199048
14 201246
15 201044
16 201141
17 199440
18 201237
19 200736
20 201135

About Robert M. Lust

Robert M. Lust is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Physiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 92 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (17 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (13 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (9 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (8 papers), Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (6 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (6 papers) and Climate Change and Health Impacts (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (461 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (300 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (80 citations), Physiology (444 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (104 citations). Robert M. Lust has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Saudi Arabia and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jitka A. I. Virag, Laxmansa C. Katwa, W. Randolph Chitwood, Christopher J. Wingard, Robert C. Noland, Joseph R. Elbeery, Christopher L. Wixon, Michael R. Van Scott, You Su Sun and Jon F. Moran. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, Circulation, The FASEB Journal and Peptides.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact