Peter Konstantiniuk

30 papers receiving 526 citations

Peers

Peter Konstantiniuk
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Cancer Research 329
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 163
  • Surgery 229
  • Oncology 82
  • Rehabilitation 16
Replace Murray M. Flett with:
Murray M. Flett United Kingdom
Niyazi Karaman Türkiye
Giorgio Soliani Italy
Paula Mustonen Finland
Ashraf A. Khater Egypt
Siaw Ming Chai Australia
Christopher Ronald Baliski Canada
Chien‐Liang Liu Taiwan
Müjgan Çalışkan Türkiye
Yonca Kanber Canada
Peter Konstantiniuk relative to Murray M. Flett United Kingdom Murray M. Flett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.7×
Murray M. Flett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Konstantiniuk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Konstantiniuk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Konstantiniuk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Konstantiniuk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Konstantiniuk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Konstantiniuk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Konstantiniuk. The network helps show where Peter Konstantiniuk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Konstantiniuk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Konstantiniuk Line = papers co-authored together Peter Konstantiniuk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002104
2 200674
3 200571
4 201356
5 200843
6 200536
7 200429
8 201120
9 200713
10 200213
11 200212
12 200110
13 20199
14 19988
15 20027
16
Intraoperative frozen section examination of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer.
20056
17 20145
18 20025
19 20165
20 20025

About Peter Konstantiniuk

Peter Konstantiniuk is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 555 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (15 papers), Breast Lesions and Carcinomas (8 papers), Breast Implant and Reconstruction (5 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (3 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (3 papers), Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors (2 papers), Infectious Aortic and Vascular Conditions (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (329 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (163 citations), Surgery (229 citations), Oncology (82 citations) and Rehabilitation (16 citations). Peter Konstantiniuk has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Australia and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anton Haid, Peter Schrenk, Michael Knauer, Tina Ulrike Cohnert, Roland Reitsamer, Sabine Pöstlberger, G. Zimmermann, Thorsten Kuehn, R. Kreienberg and Roswitha Köberle-Wührer. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Journal of Vascular Surgery, Annals of Surgical Oncology, BMJ Open and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact