Peter N. Swift

760 citations
46 papers · 338 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Peter N. Swift

38 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Peter N. Swift
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 124
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 111
  • Environmental Engineering 65
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 17
  • Global and Planetary Change 54
Replace R.P. Rechard with:
R.P. Rechard United States
H.T. Peterson United States
F. Gering Germany
M. Semih Yücemen Türkiye
Selçuk Toprak Türkiye
Mohammad R. Zolfaghari Iran
Steen Cordt Hoe Denmark
M. Tombette France
Hiroki Ishibashi Japan
Changshou Hong China
Peter N. Swift relative to R.P. Rechard United States R.P. Rechard's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
R.P. Rechard · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter N. Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter N. Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter N. Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter N. Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter N. Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter N. Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter N. Swift. The network helps show where Peter N. Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter N. Swift, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter N. Swift Line = papers co-authored together Peter N. Swift links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199349
2 199537
3 201621
4 200020
5 201318
6 199814
7 201314
8 200011
9 200111
10 199310
11 201210
12 20149
13 20188
14 20128
15 19908
16 19977
17 19967
18 19977
19 19967
20 20126

About Peter N. Swift

Peter N. Swift is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Materials Chemistry, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Global and Planetary Change and Environmental Engineering, having authored 46 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nuclear and radioactivity studies (26 papers), Graphite, nuclear technology, radiation studies (18 papers), Risk and Safety Analysis (12 papers), Radioactive contamination and transfer (7 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (6 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (6 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (3 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (124 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (111 citations), Environmental Engineering (65 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (17 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (54 citations). Peter N. Swift has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include J.C. Helton, J.W. Garner, R.P. Rechard, M.G. Marietta, Thomas F. Corbet, James Bean, D.R. Anderson, Nick Harvey, D. A. Galson and Clifford Hansen. Their work appears in journals such as Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Nuclear Science and Engineering, Climatic Change, Elements and Nuclear Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact