Peter Marsh

1.3k citations
52 papers · 734 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Marsh

45 papers receiving 510 citations

Peers

Peter Marsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • History 144
  • Political Science and International Relations 289
  • Public Administration 37
  • Sociology and Political Science 275
  • Geography, Planning and Development 26
Replace Linda Kealey with:
Linda Kealey Canada
T. Dunbar Moodie United States
Winifred D. Wandersee United States
James M. O’Toole United States
Keith Breckenridge South Africa
Laureen Snider Canada
Daniel H. Calhoun United States
Christopher G. A. Bryant United Kingdom
Nancy MacLean United States
Michael Parenti United States
Peter Marsh relative to Linda Kealey Canada Linda Kealey's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Linda Kealey · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Marsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Marsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Marsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Marsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Marsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Marsh. The network helps show where Peter Marsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Marsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Marsh Line = papers co-authored together Peter Marsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1989112
2
Family Group Conferences in Child Welfare
199888
3 198372
4 197648
5 199940
6 197936
7 197431
8 199930
9 199428
10 197221
11 197519
12 197919
13 197717
14 198015
15 201713
16 197012
17 197211
18 198010
19 200410
20 19699

About Peter Marsh

Peter Marsh is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, History and Clinical Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 734 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (3 papers), Political and Economic history of UK and US (3 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (2 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (2 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers) and Scottish History and National Identity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (144 citations), Political Science and International Relations (289 citations), Public Administration (37 citations), Sociology and Political Science (275 citations) and Geography, Planning and Development (26 citations). Peter Marsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Gary W. Cox, Hugh McLeod, Peter Collett, Martha Vicinus, Walter L. Arnstein, Desmond Bowen, Ann Rippin, Rose Amal, Graeme Bushell and Joan S. Stark. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies, Political Science Quarterly, American Journal of Legal History and The English Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact