Peter Mackereth

65 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers

Peter Mackereth
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 234
  • Research and Theory 9
  • Oncology 115
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 63
  • Complementary and Manual Therapy 7
Replace Hanne Würtzen with:
Hanne Würtzen Denmark
Anne A. Moore United States
Maja Johannsen Denmark
Carly Lynn Paterson United States
Fátima Pastor Ruiz Spain
Christine Marie Anne Courbasson Canada
Nasrin Matinnia Iran
Xinhua Chen China
Kelly A. Biegler United States
Katie E. J. Hann United Kingdom
Peter Mackereth relative to Hanne Würtzen Denmark Hanne Würtzen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Hanne Würtzen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mackereth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mackereth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mackereth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mackereth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Mackereth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mackereth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mackereth. The network helps show where Peter Mackereth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Mackereth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Mackereth Line = papers co-authored together Peter Mackereth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012208
2 201364
3 200843
4 200425
5 198919
6 202219
7 201016
8 200915
9 200015
10 202214
11 199512
12 200512
13 199712
14 200011
15 201010
16 20099
17 20169
18 19949
19 19998
20 20108

About Peter Mackereth

Peter Mackereth is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, General Health Professions, Oncology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 68 papers that have together received 706 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (17 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (6 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (5 papers), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (4 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (4 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (2 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (234 citations), Research and Theory (9 citations), Oncology (115 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (63 citations) and Complementary and Manual Therapy (7 citations). Peter Mackereth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hong Kong and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alex Molassiotis, Jennifer Finnegan-John, Alison Mead Richardson, Emma Ream, Jacqueline Filshie, David Ryder, Ann‐Louise Caress, Valerie F. Hillier, Katie Booth and Jacqui Stringer. Their work appears in journals such as Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, European Journal of Oncology Nursing, Acupuncture in Medicine, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact