Peter Lunt

4.3k citations
80 papers · 2.6k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Lunt

72 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Peter Lunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Communication 701
  • General Decision Sciences 73
  • Marketing 268
  • Accounting 303
  • Gender Studies 264
Replace James R. Meindl with:
James R. Meindl United States
Chanthika Pornpitakpan Singapore
Cecily D. Cooper United States
Barry Markovsky United States
Poppy Lauretta McLeod United States
Charlan Jeanne Nemeth United States
David De Cremer Netherlands
Michael F. Weigold United States
Gabriel Lenz United States
Walter C. Swap United States
Peter Lunt relative to James R. Meindl United States James R. Meindl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James R. Meindl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lunt. The network helps show where Peter Lunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lunt Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 80 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996370
2 1992253
3 2003217
4 1956211
5 1991128
6 1997123
7 2016102
8 201391
9
Mass consumption and personal identity : everyday economic experience
199287
10 201285
11 200475
12 201474
13 199756
14 199154
15 199954
16 200552
17
Economic socialization : the economic beliefs and behaviours of young people
199649
18 200945
19 200740
20 199138

About Peter Lunt

Peter Lunt is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics and Social Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (15 papers), Social Media and Politics (14 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers), Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (3 papers) and French Urban and Social Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (701 citations), General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Marketing (268 citations), Accounting (303 citations) and Gender Studies (264 citations). Peter Lunt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Sonia Livingstone, Nadia Olivero, Anne E. Adams, Flora Kokkinaki, Martina Angela Sasse, Paul H. D. Stenner, Laura Elizabeth Miller, Adrian F Furnham, ANN E. BLANDFORD and Steven D. Brown. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Psychology, British Journal of Social Psychology, Media Culture & Society, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and European Journal of Communication.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact