Peter Lunt

57 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter Lunt
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Communication 702
  • General Decision Sciences 55
  • Gender Studies 278
  • Accounting 305
  • Marketing 241
Replace James R. Meindl with:
James R. Meindl United States
Stanley Deetz United States
Cecily D. Cooper United States
Barry Markovsky United States
Chanthika Pornpitakpan Singapore
Isabel C. Botero United States
Charlan Nemeth United States
Francis J. Flynn United States
Michael F. Weigold United States
Alfie Kohn United States
Peter Lunt relative to James R. Meindl United States James R. Meindl's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
James R. Meindl · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lunt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lunt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lunt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lunt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lunt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lunt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lunt. The network helps show where Peter Lunt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lunt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lunt Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lunt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996328
2
Talk on Television: Audience Participation and Public Debate
1993289
3 1992232
4 2003202
5 1956189
6 1991125
7 201683
8 201383
9
Mass consumption and personal identity : everyday economic experience
199279
10 201276
11 200464
12 199156
13 199754
14 199954
15
Economic socialization : the economic beliefs and behaviours of young people
199645
16 200545
17 199138
18 200734
19 198833
20 200230

About Peter Lunt

Peter Lunt is a scholar working on Communication, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Gender Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (13 papers), Social Media and Politics (10 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (7 papers), Freedom of Expression and Defamation (3 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (3 papers), Housing Market and Economics (3 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) and Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (702 citations), General Decision Sciences (55 citations), Gender Studies (278 citations), Accounting (305 citations) and Marketing (241 citations). Peter Lunt has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Korea and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Sonia Livingstone, Nadia Olivero, Flora Kokkinaki, Paul Stenner, Adrian Furnham, Laura E. Miller, Steven D. Brown, Anne Adams, Ann Blandford and Jérôme Bourdon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Economic Psychology, Media Culture & Society, British Journal of Social Psychology, International Journal of Cultural Studies and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact