Peter Le Feuvre

452 citations
11 papers · 293 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Le Feuvre

9 papers receiving 280 citations

Peers

Peter Le Feuvre
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Health Informatics 20
  • Clinical Psychology 91
  • Neurology 56
  • Emergency Medical Services 17
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 13
Replace Rakhi Gaur with:
Rakhi Gaur India
Hammad Ali Fadlalmola Saudi Arabia
Caitlin R Finley Canada
Janette Baird United States
C. Ammirati France
Michael Franco Australia
Elizabeth Stovold United Kingdom
Hans van der Hoeven Netherlands
Elisa Mattiussi Italy
Michael Finn Australia
Peter Le Feuvre relative to Rakhi Gaur India Rakhi Gaur's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Rakhi Gaur · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Le Feuvre

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Le Feuvre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Le Feuvre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Le Feuvre more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Le Feuvre

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Le Feuvre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Le Feuvre. The network helps show where Peter Le Feuvre may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Le Feuvre, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Le Feuvre Line = papers co-authored together Peter Le Feuvre links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 202187
2 200683
3 202135
4 202120
5 201319
6 200818
7 200116
8 202212
9
Introducing management principles into the supply and distribution of medicines in Tunisia.
19993
10 20230
11 20230

About Peter Le Feuvre

Peter Le Feuvre is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Neurology, General Health Professions, Rehabilitation and Clinical Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (2 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (2 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (2 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (2 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (1 paper), Health and Conflict Studies (1 paper), Neurological Complications and Syndromes (1 paper) and Pain Management and Treatment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (20 citations), Clinical Psychology (91 citations), Neurology (56 citations), Emergency Medical Services (17 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (13 citations). Peter Le Feuvre has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Alison H. McGregor, Alison Holmes, Azeem Majeed, Sonia Saxena, Thomas Beaney, Sally Hargreaves, Jon S. Friedland, David Salman, Philip Gothard and Joseph Eliahoo. Their work appears in journals such as PAIN Reports, Journal of Biomechanics, Journal of Travel Medicine, BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine and BMJ Global Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact