Nadia Soliman

1.2k citations
24 papers · 427 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

    • Animal testing and alternatives 5
    • Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia 4
    • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation 4

Nadia Soliman

21 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Nadia Soliman
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Pharmacology 147
  • Reproductive Medicine 60
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 39
  • Small Animals 29
  • Physiology 92
Replace Masako Iseki with:
Masako Iseki Japan
Nickole Kanyuch United States
Farnebo Lo Sweden
Carlton Smith United States
Mylyne Tham Canada
C. Ruth González Spain
E Molina Italy
Marianthe Hamilton-Wessler United States
Gilberto Pari Italy
Mary Ziotopoulou United States
Nadia Soliman relative to Masako Iseki Japan Masako Iseki's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13×
Masako Iseki · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nadia Soliman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nadia Soliman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nadia Soliman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nadia Soliman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nadia Soliman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nadia Soliman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nadia Soliman. The network helps show where Nadia Soliman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nadia Soliman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nadia Soliman Line = papers co-authored together Nadia Soliman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2021146
2 200656
3 202145
4 202030
5 202320
6 202117
7 201916
8 202315
9 201914
10 202311
11 202311
12 20229
13 20048
14
The value of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) in predicting treatment response in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
20116
15 20235
16 20235
17 20214
18 20243
19 20252
20 20232

About Nadia Soliman

Nadia Soliman is a scholar working on Small Animals, Pharmacology, Physiology, Reproductive Medicine and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 24 papers that have together received 427 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (6 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (5 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (147 citations), Reproductive Medicine (60 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (39 citations), Small Animals (29 citations) and Physiology (92 citations). Nadia Soliman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew S.C. Rice, Tim Hillard, David P. Finn, Andrea G. Hohmann, Simon Haroutounian, Elliot J. Krane, Jan Vollert, Alexandra Bannach‐Brown, Jing Liao and Zsanett Bahor. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, PAIN Reports, European Journal of Pain, Journal of Neurochemistry and Brain Behavior and Immunity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact