Peter Lachman

63 papers receiving 864 citations

Peers

Peter Lachman
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Emergency Medical Services 205
  • Pharmacy 62
  • General Health Professions 198
  • Clinical Psychology 159
  • Health Information Management 35
Replace Claudia Campbell with:
Claudia Campbell United States
Mary Wakefield United States
Joshua Kanaabi Muliira Oman
Aidin Aryankhesal Iran
Benjamin H. Levi United States
Pauline Pearson United Kingdom
Roy Lay‐Yee New Zealand
Kristine Lykens United States
Daniela Tartaglini Italy
Sally McCarthy Australia
Peter Lachman relative to Claudia Campbell United States Claudia Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Claudia Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Lachman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Lachman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Lachman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Lachman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Lachman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Lachman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Lachman. The network helps show where Peter Lachman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Lachman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Lachman Line = papers co-authored together Peter Lachman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016102
2 200261
3 202060
4 200450
5 200946
6 202040
7 199639
8 201737
9 200631
10 201330
11 201426
12 201424
13 201722
14 199522
15 199420
16 201420
17 201717
18 202016
19 199516
20 201515

About Peter Lachman

Peter Lachman is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Clinical Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Health Information Management, having authored 71 papers that have together received 948 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (11 papers), Healthcare Quality and Management (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (6 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (5 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (5 papers) and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medical Services (205 citations), Pharmacy (62 citations), General Health Professions (198 citations), Clinical Psychology (159 citations) and Health Information Management (35 citations). Peter Lachman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey Braithwaite, Hans C. Ossebaard, Jane Runnacles, Stephen E. Muething, Claudia Bernard, Louise Wiles, W. B. Runciman, Peter Hibbert, Jessica Deighton and T. Hooper. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Child Abuse & Neglect, BMJ Open, BMJ Quality & Safety and Archives of Disease in Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact