Peter L. Chang

3.6k citations
85 papers · 2.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

    • Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies 13
    • Agricultural pest management studies 11
    • Genetic diversity and population structure 7

Peter L. Chang

85 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Peers

Peter L. Chang
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 363
  • Aging 60
  • Genetics 464
  • Insect Science 164
  • Plant Science 445
Replace Christopher D. Wood with:
Christopher D. Wood Mexico
Timo Strünker Germany
Kyung‐Ah Lee South Korea
Gerald J. Wyckoff United States
Anamaria Necşulea France
László Orbán Singapore
Yusuke Kato Japan
Tanya Vavouri Spain
Harm van Heerikhuizen Netherlands
Stanley Friedman United States
Peter L. Chang relative to Christopher D. Wood Mexico Christopher D. Wood's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Christopher D. Wood · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter L. Chang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter L. Chang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter L. Chang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter L. Chang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter L. Chang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter L. Chang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter L. Chang. The network helps show where Peter L. Chang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter L. Chang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter L. Chang Line = papers co-authored together Peter L. Chang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 85 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999146
2 201294
3 201193
4 201292
5 200589
6 200082
7 200282
8 201173
9 200166
10 201365
11 201065
12 202061
13 201554
14 201653
15 201247
16 200042
17 201438
18 201637
19 201432
20 197528

About Peter L. Chang

Peter L. Chang is a scholar working on Plant Science, Genetics, Molecular Biology, Ecology and Reproductive Medicine, having authored 85 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies (13 papers), Agricultural pest management studies (11 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (7 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (7 papers), Botanical Research and Chemistry (6 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (4 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (4 papers) and Oil Palm Production and Sustainability (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (363 citations), Aging (60 citations), Genetics (464 citations), Insect Science (164 citations) and Plant Science (445 citations). Peter L. Chang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Sergey V. Nuzhdin, Mark V. Sauer, S.D.M. Brown, Michelle N Arbeitman, Joseph P. Dunham, Steven R. Lindheim, Maren Friesen, Marco Passamonti, Fabrizio Ghiselli and Liliana Milani. Their work appears in journals such as Fertility and Sterility, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, The Journal of Organic Chemistry, Journal of the American Chemical Society and BMC Genomics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact