Peter J. Stanlis

711 citations
19 papers · 110 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Stanlis

13 papers receiving 72 citations

Peers

Peter J. Stanlis
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • General Psychology 3
  • History and Philosophy of Science 10
  • Philosophy 21
  • Political Science and International Relations 44
  • History 14
Replace Gotthold Ephraim Lessing with:
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Chile
W. H. Bruford
Novalis
Hugo Ott
R. L. Brett United Kingdom
Gerhard P. Knapp
Paul Michael Lützeler United States
Ernst Benz Germany
John L. Mahoney United States
Joseph Mali Israel
Peter J. Stanlis relative to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing Chile Gotthold Ephraim Lessing's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Gotthold Ephraim Lessing · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Stanlis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Stanlis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Stanlis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Stanlis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Stanlis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Stanlis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Stanlis. The network helps show where Peter J. Stanlis may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Stanlis, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Stanlis Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Stanlis links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 201733
2
Selected Writings and Speeches
198524
3 195913
4 19769
5 19597
6 19537
7 19583
8 19873
9
Edmund Burke, a bibliography of secondary studies to 1982
19832
10 19652
11
Robert Frost: The Poet as Philosopher
20072
12 19922
13
The relevance of Edmund Burke
19641
14 20051
15 19581
16 20170
17 19630
18
Conversations with Robert Frost: The Bread Loaf Period
20090
19 19680

About Peter J. Stanlis

Peter J. Stanlis is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science and Law, having authored 19 papers that have together received 110 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (11 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (2 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (1 paper), Legal principles and applications (1 paper), Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (1 paper) and Political Theory and Influence (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (3 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations), Philosophy (21 citations), Political Science and International Relations (44 citations) and History (14 citations). Peter J. Stanlis has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Arthur O. Lovejoy, Edmund Burke, Joseph Hamburger, Robert Frost, Frank Lentricchia, Christopher M. Reid, Louis I. Bredvold, Daniel Ritchie, Carl B. Cone and Stephen R. Graubard. Their work appears in journals such as Eighteenth-Century Studies, The New England Quarterly, Journal of British Studies, The William and Mary Quarterly and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact