Hugo Ott

505 citations
13 papers · 108 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Hugo Ott

7 papers receiving 78 citations

Peers

Hugo Ott
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Philosophy 56
  • General Psychology 4
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 28
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
  • Architecture 2
Replace Günter Figal with:
Günter Figal Germany
Jean‐François Courtine France
Peter J. Stanlis United States
Lord Shaftesbury
John E. Atwell United States
Hermann Cohen Switzerland
Novalis
Dieter Freundlieb Australia
Ernesto Grassi United States
A. D. Nuttall United Kingdom
Hugo Ott relative to Günter Figal Germany Günter Figal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Günter Figal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hugo Ott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugo Ott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugo Ott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugo Ott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugo Ott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugo Ott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugo Ott. The network helps show where Hugo Ott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Hugo Ott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hugo Ott Line = papers co-authored together Hugo Ott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199464
2
Martin Heidegger : unterwegs zu seiner Biographie
198830
3 19945
4 19953
5 20143
6
Statistik der öffentlichen Elektrizitätsversorgung Deutschlands 1890-1913
19861
7
Las raíces católicas del pensamiento de Heidegger
19931
8
The mediaeval statutes of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Freiburg im Breisgau
19641
9
Studien zur Geschichte des Klosters St. Blasien im hohen und späten Mittelalter
19630
10 19910
11 20180
12
Le radici cattoliche nel pensiero di Heidegger
19950
13
Martin Heidegger: en camino hacia su biografía
19920

About Hugo Ott

Hugo Ott is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy and Archeology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (4 papers), Religious and Theological Studies (3 papers), Medieval European History and Architecture (2 papers), European history and politics (2 papers), Philosophy and Phenomenology Studies (2 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (2 papers), German Social Sciences and History (1 paper) and Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (56 citations), General Psychology (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (28 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Architecture (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include Catherine Kord, Charles E. Scott, Hans Sluga, Klaus Schwabe, J. M. Fletcher, Hans Jürgen Maier, Hans Friedrich Zacher and Evi Ziegler c o EDV Fotowerk Huber. Their work appears in journals such as American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The Antioch Review, Journal of educational thought. and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact