Peter J. Smith

1.1k citations
9 papers · 286 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Peter J. Smith

8 papers receiving 278 citations

Peers

Peter J. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Communication 41
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 50
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 126
  • Social Psychology 50
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 5
Replace Alvin Lee with:
Alvin Lee Singapore
Majorie Dijkstra Netherlands
Amanda Thompson United States
Masako Amano Japan
Matthias M. Graf Germany
Katherine Price United Kingdom
Sujin Song South Korea
Wen Wu China
Chung-Jye Hung Taiwan
Carol W. Sexton United States
Peter J. Smith relative to Alvin Lee Singapore Alvin Lee's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Alvin Lee · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smith. The network helps show where Peter J. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 2002115
2 2008100
3 200529
4 200616
5
Flexible delivery in Australia : origins and conceptualisations
199912
6 201511
7 19752
8
Studying and living in Australia : a guide for Asian students
19901
9 20260

About Peter J. Smith

Peter J. Smith is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Education, Surgery, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 9 papers that have together received 286 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Education Systems and Policy (2 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques (1 paper), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (1 paper) and Healthcare innovation and challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (41 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (50 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (126 citations), Social Psychology (50 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (5 citations). Peter J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Mark Peterson, David C. Thomas, Paul Desmond, Oliver Hennessy, Andrew F. Little, Andrew C.F. Taylor, John Slavin, Stephen Schlicht, Gerard Powell and Peter Choong. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, American Journal of Neuroradiology and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact