Peter J. Smith
Impact in
- Molecular Medicine top 0.5%
- Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
- Biomaterials top 2%
Papers in
-
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls 10
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 2
-
- Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology 3
- Food composition and properties 3
- Co-authors
- David A. Rees (4 shared papers)David Thom (1 shared paper)Edwin R. Morris (1 shared paper)Breeanna R. Urbanowicz (10 shared papers)María J. Peña (5 shared papers)William S. York (3 shared papers)Hsin‐Tzu Wang (2 shared papers)Fabian Pfrengle (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (1 paper)ChemBioChem (1 paper)New Phytologist (1 paper)ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (1 paper)ACS Materials Au (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustria
In The Last Decade
Peter J. Smith
16 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Peter J. Smith's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Molecular Medicine 483
- Biomaterials 567
- Food Science 614
- Pharmaceutical Science 190
- Plant Science 811
Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Smith. The network helps show where Peter J. Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Biological interactions between polysaccharides and divalent cations: The egg‐box model Hit paper breakdown → | 1973 | 2248 |
| 2 | 2017 | 120 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 60 | |
| 4 | 1975 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 30 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 26 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 11 | 1975 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1975 | 1 |
About Peter J. Smith
Peter J. Smith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Food Science, having authored 16 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls (10 papers), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (4 papers), Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (3 papers), Food composition and properties (3 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Biofuel production and bioconversion (3 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (2 papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Medicine (483 citations), Biomaterials (567 citations), Food Science (614 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (190 citations) and Plant Science (811 citations). Peter J. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include David A. Rees, David Thom, Edwin R. Morris, Breeanna R. Urbanowicz, María J. Peña, William S. York, Hsin‐Tzu Wang, Fabian Pfrengle, Colin Ruprecht and Jeong‐Yeh Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry, ChemBioChem, New Phytologist, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering and ACS Materials Au.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.