Peter J. Frederick

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter J. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Biological Psychiatry 76
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 155
  • Reproductive Medicine 181
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 35
  • Oncology 230
Replace Yan Cai with:
Yan Cai China
David J. Phillips United States
Xiaoyin “Sara” Jiang United States
Nicole D. Fleming United States
Raul S. González United States
Donna Hylton United States
Julie Bergeron Canada
Veanne N. Anderson United States
Thomas G. Greene United States
Steven Stone United States
Peter J. Frederick relative to Yan Cai China Yan Cai's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Yan Cai · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Frederick. The network helps show where Peter J. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020145
2 2009126
3 201891
4 201689
5 198677
6 198770
7 201051
8 201849
9 201141
10 201840
11 200939
12 200739
13 198138
14 201636
15 201535
16 200931
17 199531
18 200929
19 201028
20 201128

About Peter J. Frederick

Peter J. Frederick is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (15 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (4 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (3 papers), Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (3 papers), Testicular diseases and treatments (2 papers) and Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (76 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (155 citations), Reproductive Medicine (181 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (35 citations) and Oncology (230 citations). Peter J. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Egypt. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Straughn, Kunle Odunsi, Shashikant Lele, Stacey N. Akers, Emese Zsíros, William E. Grizzle, Sarah Lynam, J. Brian Szender, Lacey R. McNally and James E. Kendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancer Research, Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology and Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact