Peter J. Frederick

61 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Peter J. Frederick
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Reproductive Medicine 275
  • Biological Psychiatry 73
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 183
  • Oncology 304
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 57
Replace Steve Kim with:
Steve Kim United States
Samario Chaitchik Israel
Anne M. Mills United States
Nicole D. Fleming United States
David J. Phillips United States
Yan Cai China
Mary Beattie United States
Francisco José Cândido dos Reis Brazil
Susan A. Davidson United States
Raul S. González United States
Peter J. Frederick relative to Steve Kim United States Steve Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.8×
Steve Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Frederick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Frederick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Frederick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Frederick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Frederick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Frederick. The network helps show where Peter J. Frederick may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Frederick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Frederick Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Frederick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2020142
2 2009118
3 201888
4 201683
5 198675
6 198766
7 201051
8 201845
9 201139
10 201839
11 200939
12 200737
13 198137
14 201635
15 201534
16 200928
17 201128
18 199528
19 201027
20 200926

About Peter J. Frederick

Peter J. Frederick is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (20 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (6 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (5 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (4 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (4 papers), Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (3 papers) and Advances in Oncology and Radiotherapy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (275 citations), Biological Psychiatry (73 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (183 citations), Oncology (304 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (57 citations). Peter J. Frederick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Slovakia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include J. Michael Straughn, Kunle Odunsi, Shashikant Lele, Stacey N. Akers, Emese Zsíros, Sarah Lynam, William E. Grizzle, J. Brian Szender, Lacey R. McNally and James E. Kendrick. Their work appears in journals such as Gynecologic Oncology, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Cancer Research, JAMA Network Open and The American Historical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact