Peter J. Fordham

13 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers

Peter J. Fordham
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Analytical Chemistry 41
  • Pharmaceutical Science 25
  • Organic Chemistry 113
  • Filtration and Separation 7
  • Catalysis 22
Replace Alan G. Rowley with:
Alan G. Rowley United Kingdom
Michael F. Cox United States
Mutsuo Kitagawa Japan
Tania Farías Cuba
M. W. Scoggins United States
Pierre M. Bersier Switzerland
Heinz‐Gerhard Franck Germany
Arthur W. Herriott United States
Pertti Kokkonen Finland
S. Friedman United States
Peter J. Fordham relative to Alan G. Rowley United Kingdom Alan G. Rowley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Alan G. Rowley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Fordham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Fordham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Fordham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Fordham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Fordham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Fordham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Fordham. The network helps show where Peter J. Fordham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Fordham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Fordham Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Fordham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 199071
2 199558
3 200750
4 199742
5 199536
6 199530
7 200111
8 199811
9 199910
10 19979
11 20014
12
Non-destructive testing techniques
19682
13 20011

About Peter J. Fordham

Peter J. Fordham is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Spectroscopy, Organic Chemistry and Pollution, having authored 13 papers that have together received 335 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (4 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (2 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (2 papers), Electrochemical Analysis and Applications (2 papers) and Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (41 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (25 citations), Organic Chemistry (113 citations), Filtration and Separation (7 citations) and Catalysis (22 citations). Peter J. Fordham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michèle Besson, Colin Booth, David Attwood, J. W. Gramshaw, P. Gallezot, М. Бессон, Helen M. Crews, Beate Kiese, Marc Saltzman and G Sędek. Their work appears in journals such as Food Additives & Contaminants, Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, Catalysis Letters, The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Food and Chemical Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact