Peter J. Clark

25 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers

Peter J. Clark
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • History and Philosophy of Science 71
  • Ecological Modeling 36
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 88
  • Ocean Engineering 88
  • Theoretical Computer Science 5
Replace John Ware Stephenson with:
John Ware Stephenson United States
Shan Gao China
Alice Eldridge United Kingdom
James Campbell Netherlands
W. G. S. Hines Canada
Andrew Taylor United States
Simon Leblanc Canada
Alicia Burns Australia
Iwan W. Griffiths United Kingdom
Peter J. Clark relative to John Ware Stephenson United States John Ware Stephenson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×17.8×
John Ware Stephenson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter J. Clark

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter J. Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter J. Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter J. Clark more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter J. Clark

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter J. Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter J. Clark. The network helps show where Peter J. Clark may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter J. Clark, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter J. Clark Line = papers co-authored together Peter J. Clark links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007132
2 197642
3
The discovery of the conservation of energy
197438
4 201837
5 201630
6 201826
7 201818
8 198715
9 199813
10 201712
11 200110
12 19876
13 19734
14 19924
15 19964
16 19923
17 20093
18 19733
19 20163
20 20072

About Peter J. Clark

Peter J. Clark is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, History and Philosophy of Science, Theoretical Computer Science, Geophysics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 27 papers that have together received 411 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drilling and Well Engineering (5 papers), Oil and Gas Production Techniques (5 papers), Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (3 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (2 papers) and Probability and Statistical Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (71 citations), Ecological Modeling (36 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (88 citations), Ocean Engineering (88 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (5 citations). Peter J. Clark has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Frances S. Chew, J. Michael Reed, E. Hugh Stitt, Jeremy Butterfield, Michele Marigo, Zilin Yan, Nancy I. Bergstrom, Henry F. Wilson, Irene Mitchell and Benny Poedjono. Their work appears in journals such as SPE Drilling & Completion, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Johnson Matthey Technology Review, Lecture notes in physics and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact