Peter Howley

2.5k citations
71 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Howley

67 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Howley
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 358
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 376
  • Global and Planetary Change 548
  • Transportation 148
  • Urban Studies 121
Replace Neil Ravenscroft with:
Neil Ravenscroft United Kingdom
Jordi Honey‐Rosés Canada
Eija Pouta Finland
Liesbet Vranken Belgium
Robert L. Ryan United States
Richard C. Stedman United States
Neelam C. Poudyal United States
Nicolai V. Kuminoff United States
Yuta J. Masuda United States
Andreas Kontoleon United Kingdom
Peter Howley relative to Neil Ravenscroft United Kingdom Neil Ravenscroft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Neil Ravenscroft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Howley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Howley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Howley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Howley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Howley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Howley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Howley. The network helps show where Peter Howley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Howley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Howley Line = papers co-authored together Peter Howley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011199
2 2009189
3 2011147
4 201497
5 201593
6 200891
7 201290
8 201981
9 200965
10 201146
11 201344
12 201942
13 201338
14 201732
15 201329
16 201729
17 201527
18 201227
19 201926
20 201225

About Peter Howley

Peter Howley is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Sociology and Political Science, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (19 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (14 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (9 papers), Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies (9 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (8 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (8 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (358 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (376 citations), Global and Planetary Change (548 citations), Transportation (148 citations) and Urban Studies (121 citations). Peter Howley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cathal O. Donoghue, Stephen Hynes, Declan Redmond, Mark Scott, Cathal Buckley, Kevin Heanue, Jonathan Ensor, Emma Dillon, Mary Ryan and Oliver Taherzadeh. Their work appears in journals such as Land Use Policy, Land Economics, Ecological Economics, Journal of Rural Studies and Work Employment and Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact