Peter Hocks
Impact in
- Insect Science top 5%
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Insect Utilization and Effects
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
-
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Papers in
-
- Medicinal plant effects and applications 4
- Herbal Medicine Research Studies 3
-
- Healthcare and Venom Research 4
- Co-authors
- Rudolf Wiechert (10 shared papers)Hans Martin Hoffmeister (2 shared papers)A. Fürst (9 shared papers)Andreas E. Furlenmeier (9 shared papers)Albert Langemann (8 shared papers)Gerhard Spiteller (1 shared paper)Ulrich Kerb (8 shared papers)Peter Karlson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Helvetica Chimica Acta (4 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (3 papers)Die Naturwissenschaften (1 paper)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (1 paper)Chemische Berichte (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Peter Hocks
15 papers receiving 318 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Insect Science 150
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 168
- Genetics 103
- Complementary and alternative medicine 19
- Biotechnology 19
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hocks
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hocks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hocks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hocks. The network helps show where Peter Hocks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 19 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hocks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1965 | 121 | |
| 2 | 1966 | 59 | |
| 3 | 1967 | 39 | |
| 4 | 1967 | 33 | |
| 5 | 1966 | 30 | |
| 6 | 1966 | 25 | |
| 7 | 1966 | 24 | |
| 8 | 1966 | 23 | |
| 9 | 1960 | 11 | |
| 10 | 1966 | 11 | |
| 11 | 1966 | 10 | |
| 12 | 1968 | 8 | |
| 13 | 1966 | 8 | |
| 14 | 1967 | 6 | |
| 15 | Reaktionsmechanismen der organischen Chemie : eine Einführung | 1974 | 1 |
About Peter Hocks
Peter Hocks is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Pharmacology, Organic Chemistry, Insect Science and Cancer Research, having authored 15 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare and Venom Research (4 papers), Medicinal plant effects and applications (4 papers), Steroid Chemistry and Biochemistry (3 papers), Herbal Medicine Research Studies (3 papers), Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (2 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (150 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (168 citations), Genetics (103 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (19 citations) and Biotechnology (19 citations). Peter Hocks has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Rudolf Wiechert, Hans Martin Hoffmeister, A. Fürst, Andreas E. Furlenmeier, Albert Langemann, Gerhard Spiteller, Ulrich Kerb, Peter Karlson, M. Neil Galbraith and Denis H. S. Horn. Their work appears in journals such as Helvetica Chimica Acta, Tetrahedron Letters, Die Naturwissenschaften, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Chemische Berichte.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.