Peter Herbst

460 citations
19 papers · 334 · h-index 11

Impact in

    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
    • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
    • Phosphorus compounds and reactions
    • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis
    • Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies

Papers in

    • Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods 10
    • Phosphorus compounds and reactions 5
    • Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis 3
    • Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions 2

Peter Herbst

19 papers receiving 306 citations

Peers

Peter Herbst
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Organic Chemistry 204
  • Cancer Research 80
  • Pharmacology 31
  • Plant Science 70
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 17
Replace J. M. VAN DER VEEN with:
J. M. VAN DER VEEN United States
M. W. Partridge United Kingdom
GI Feutrill Australia
N. Danieli Israel
G. I. FEUTRILL Australia
LN Mander Australia
Luciano Lombardo Australia
S. THOREN Sweden
Gerrit A. Stork Netherlands
R. B. MITRA India
Peter Herbst relative to J. M. VAN DER VEEN United States J. M. VAN DER VEEN's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
J. M. VAN DER VEEN · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Herbst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Herbst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Herbst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Herbst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Herbst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Herbst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Herbst. The network helps show where Peter Herbst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Peter Herbst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Herbst Line = papers co-authored together Peter Herbst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 196158
2 196439
3 196238
4 196134
5 196330
6 197621
7 195820
8 195719
9 195715
10 196014
11 196011
12 195910
13 19607
14 19705
15 20114
16 19743
17 19723
18 19742
19 19721

About Peter Herbst

Peter Herbst is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Biomaterials and Spectroscopy, having authored 19 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (10 papers), Phosphorus compounds and reactions (5 papers), Carbohydrate Chemistry and Synthesis (3 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (2 papers), Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (2 papers), biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties (2 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (2 papers) and Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (204 citations), Cancer Research (80 citations), Pharmacology (31 citations), Plant Science (70 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (17 citations). Peter Herbst has collaborated with scholars based in Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ferdinand Bohlmann, Christian Arndt, Hans Bornowski, Käthe‐Marie Kleine, Heinz Dürr, Peter Bischof, Rolf Gleiter and Hans Leismann. Their work appears in journals such as Chemische Berichte, Synthesis, Journal of Chromatography A, Planta Medica and Tetrahedron Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact