Peter Heehs

435 citations
30 papers · 199 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Heehs

26 papers receiving 129 citations

Peers

Peter Heehs
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Anthropology 45
  • Philosophy 47
  • Religious studies 15
  • Sociology and Political Science 102
  • Political Science and International Relations 55
Replace İan Almond with:
İan Almond Türkiye
Charles Malamoud France
Regina Schwartz United States
Michel Despland Canada
Régine Robin Canada
Diane Apostolos‐Cappadona United States
Shruti Kapila United Kingdom
Sandra Bermann United States
Michel Leiris Germany
Stephen Prothero United States
Peter Heehs relative to İan Almond Türkiye İan Almond's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
İan Almond · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Heehs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Heehs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Heehs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Heehs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Heehs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Heehs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Heehs. The network helps show where Peter Heehs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 3 scholars most cited alongside Peter Heehs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Heehs Line = papers co-authored together Peter Heehs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199436
2 199635
3 200322
4 199119
5
The lives of Sri Aurobindo
200816
6 199410
7
Nationalism, Terrorism, Communalism: Essays in Modern Indian History
19988
8
Indian religions : a historical reader of spiritual expression and experience
20027
9 19886
10 19936
11 20064
12
The Essential Writings of Sri Aurobindo
19704
13 20183
14 20153
15
Genius, mysticism, and madness.
19973
16 20112
17 19912
18 19922
19 19922
20 19972

About Peter Heehs

Peter Heehs is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Religious studies and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Indian History and Philosophy (8 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (7 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (4 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (2 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (2 papers) and Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (45 citations), Philosophy (47 citations), Religious studies (15 citations), Sociology and Political Science (102 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (55 citations). Peter Heehs has collaborated with scholars based in United States, India and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Sumit Sarkar, Stephen Phillips and Aurobindo Ghose. Their work appears in journals such as History and Theory, International Journal of Hindu Studies, Postcolonial Studies, South Asian Studies and South Asia Journal of South Asian Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact