James Procter

571 citations
23 papers · 244 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James Procter

19 papers receiving 165 citations

Peers

James Procter
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Literature and Literary Theory 125
  • Cultural Studies 42
  • Music 15
  • Anthropology 30
  • History 32
Replace David Palumbo‐Liu with:
David Palumbo‐Liu United States
Gaurav Desai United States
Joseph A. Kestner United States
Charles H Rowell
David Spurr United States
Madhu Dubey United States
Robert F. Reid-Pharr United States
Nahum Dimitri Chandler United States
Faye Hammill United Kingdom
Amritjit Singh Italy
James Procter relative to David Palumbo‐Liu United States David Palumbo‐Liu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
David Palumbo‐Liu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Procter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Procter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Procter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Procter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Procter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Procter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Procter. The network helps show where James Procter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside James Procter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Procter Line = papers co-authored together James Procter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Dwelling Places: Postwar Black British Writing
200399
2 200463
3 200217
4 201516
5 201410
6 20099
7
Reading Across Worlds: Transnational Book Groups and the Reception of Difference
20146
8 20115
9 20113
10 20103
11 20073
12 20162
13 20102
14
That's maybe where I come from but that’s not how I read: Diaspora, Location and Reading Identities
20121
15 20181
16
Reading as 'Social Glue': Book Groups, Multiculture, and Small Island Read 2007
20091
17 20191
18
Out of Bounds: British Black & Asian Poets
20131
19 20061
20 20240

About James Procter

James Procter is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Demography, having authored 23 papers that have together received 244 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (12 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (3 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Diaspora, migration, transnational identity (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Linguistic, Cultural, and Literary Studies (1 paper), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper) and Urban and Rural Development Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (125 citations), Cultural Studies (42 citations), Music (15 citations), Anthropology (30 citations) and History (32 citations). James Procter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Bethan Benwell, Gemma Robinson, Angela Smith, Danielle Fuller, David Murphy, Michelle Keown and Jackie Kay. Their work appears in journals such as Interventions, Small Axe A Caribbean Journal of Criticism, World Literature Today, Diasporas and Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact