Peter Harley
Impact in
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
-
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering 5
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research 3
- Nerve injury and regeneration 2
-
- Pluripotent Stem Cells Research 3
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders 3
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Co-authors
- Ivo Lieberam (7 shared papers)Zoe Hore (2 shared papers)Sara E. Jager (2 shared papers)Franziska Denk (2 shared papers)George F. McNulty (1 shared paper)Christian Bjerggaard Vægter (1 shared paper)Mette Richner (1 shared paper)Stephen B. McMahon (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Cell Reports (1 paper)Pain (1 paper)Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (1 paper)Brain Research (1 paper)Advanced Materials (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Peter Harley
15 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Developmental Neuroscience 34
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 109
- Neurology 30
- Neurology 51
- Genetics 36
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Harley
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Harley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Harley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Harley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Harley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Harley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Harley. The network helps show where Peter Harley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Harley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 40 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1979 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2023 | 18 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 5 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1978 | 1 |
About Peter Harley
Peter Harley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers), Muscle Physiology and Disorders (3 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (3 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (2 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (2 papers), Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (34 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (109 citations), Neurology (30 citations), Neurology (51 citations) and Genetics (36 citations). Peter Harley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ivo Lieberam, Zoe Hore, Sara E. Jager, Franziska Denk, George F. McNulty, Christian Bjerggaard Vægter, Mette Richner, Stephen B. McMahon, Lone Tjener Pallesen and Federica Riccio. Their work appears in journals such as Cell Reports, Pain, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Brain Research and Advanced Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.