Peter Hanks

797 citations
24 papers · 402 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

    • Philosophy and Theoretical Science 17
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
    • Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 4
    • Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2

Peter Hanks

18 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Peter Hanks
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 297
  • History and Philosophy of Science 113
  • Philosophy 259
  • Language and Linguistics 65
  • Artificial Intelligence 74
Replace Dilip Ninan with:
Dilip Ninan United States
Justin Khoo United States
Genoveva Martí Spain
Wolfgang Künne Germany
Anthony Everett United States
Mark Crimmins United States
Joseph Almog
Dan López de Spain
Eros Corazza Canada
Fabrizio Cariani United States
Peter Hanks relative to Dilip Ninan United States Dilip Ninan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Dilip Ninan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hanks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hanks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hanks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hanks. The network helps show where Peter Hanks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hanks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hanks Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hanks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015150
2 201185
3 200744
4 200621
5 200920
6 201215
7 201314
8
Belief about the Self: A Defense of the Property Theory of Content
200813
9 201612
10 20186
11 20076
12 20155
13 20143
14 20063
15 20121
16 20221
17
Predication and rule-following
20171
18 20171
19 20191
20 20080

About Peter Hanks

Peter Hanks is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Artificial Intelligence and Language and Linguistics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 402 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (4 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers) and Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (297 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (113 citations), Philosophy (259 citations), Language and Linguistics (65 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (74 citations). Peter Hanks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Poland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Brendan O’Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Philosophical Studies, Disputatio, Philosophy Compass and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact