Peter Hanks
Impact in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Philosophy top 1%
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Papers in
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 12
- Philosophy 12
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 7
- Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications 3
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 2
- Mental Health and Psychiatry 1
- Co-authors
- Brendan O’Sullivan (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Philosophical Studies (2 papers)Synthese (2 papers)Disputatio (1 paper)Erkenntnis (1 paper)Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Hanks
16 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 249
- Philosophy 210
- History and Philosophy of Science 84
- Language and Linguistics 54
- Artificial Intelligence 67
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hanks
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hanks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hanks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hanks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hanks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hanks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hanks. The network helps show where Peter Hanks may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hanks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 105 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 79 | |
| 3 | 2007 | 41 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 9 | Belief about the Self: A Defense of the Property Theory of Content | 2008 | 11 |
| 10 | 2018 | 6 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 2 | |
| 14 | Predication and rule-following | 2017 | 1 |
| 15 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 0 |
About Peter Hanks
Peter Hanks is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (12 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (7 papers), Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications (3 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (249 citations), Philosophy (210 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (84 citations), Language and Linguistics (54 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (67 citations). Peter Hanks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Brendan O’Sullivan. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophical Studies, Synthese, Disputatio, Erkenntnis and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.