Peter Goldsmith

83 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Goldsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 190
  • Business and International Management 45
  • Soil Science 119
  • Strategy and Management 182
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 108
Replace Cesar Revoredo‐Giha with:
Cesar Revoredo‐Giha United Kingdom
Piero Conforti Italy
Rob Vos United States
Jeroen Candel Netherlands
Hikaru Hanawa Peterson United States
K. Weinberger Taiwan
Miroslava Bavorová Czechia
Amin William Mugera Australia
Seneshaw Tamru Belgium
Junfei Bai China
Peter Goldsmith relative to Cesar Revoredo‐Giha United Kingdom Cesar Revoredo‐Giha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cesar Revoredo‐Giha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goldsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goldsmith. The network helps show where Peter Goldsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goldsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goldsmith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goldsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 88 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009238
2 200872
3 201563
4 201855
5 201454
6 200152
7 200849
8 201946
9 201644
10 200440
11 200437
12 201834
13 202028
14 201525
15 201625
16 200623
17 197922
18 199820
19 200120
20 200419

About Peter Goldsmith

Peter Goldsmith is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Plant Science, Strategy and Management and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (17 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (7 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (7 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (6 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (5 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (5 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (5 papers) and Intellectual Property and Patents (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (190 citations), Business and International Management (45 citations), Soil Science (119 citations), Strategy and Management (182 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (108 citations). Peter Goldsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Tadayoshi Masuda, Alex E Winter-Nelson, Thomas L. Sporleder, Edward Martey, Kathy Baylis, Zhiying Zhang, Hope Michelson, Liana G. Acevedo‐Siaca, Kent D. Rausch and Hans Henrik Stein. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural Economics, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie, Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Environmental and Resource Economics and Agriculture and Human Values.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact