Peter Goldsmith

79 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Peter Goldsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 186
  • Business and International Management 43
  • Soil Science 120
  • Strategy and Management 162
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 97
Replace Cesar Revoredo‐Giha with:
Cesar Revoredo‐Giha United Kingdom
K. Weinberger Taiwan
Piero Conforti Italy
Amin Mugera Australia
Jeroen Candel Netherlands
Wolfgang Bokelmann Germany
Junfei Bai China
Ellen McCullough United States
Bruce L. Dixon United States
Seneshaw Tamru Belgium
Peter Goldsmith relative to Cesar Revoredo‐Giha United Kingdom Cesar Revoredo‐Giha's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Cesar Revoredo‐Giha · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Goldsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Goldsmith. The network helps show where Peter Goldsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Goldsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Goldsmith Line = papers co-authored together Peter Goldsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2009230
2 201556
3 200148
4 200848
5 201947
6 201445
7 201844
8 201641
9 200436
10 200434
11 201833
12 201626
13 202024
14 200624
15 201523
16 199820
17 197920
18 200119
19 200118
20 200117

About Peter Goldsmith

Peter Goldsmith is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Plant Science, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (18 papers), Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets (6 papers), Soybean genetics and cultivation (6 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (5 papers), Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems (5 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (5 papers), Agricultural risk and resilience (4 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (186 citations), Business and International Management (43 citations), Soil Science (120 citations), Strategy and Management (162 citations) and Agronomy and Crop Science (97 citations). Peter Goldsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ghana and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Tadayoshi Masuda, Alex Winter‐Nelson, Thomas L. Sporleder, Edward Martey, Hope Michelson, Zhiying Zhang, Kathy Baylis, Liana G. Acevedo‐Siaca, Hans H Stein and Kent D. Rausch. Their work appears in journals such as Agricultural Economics, Food and Nutrition Bulletin, Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie, Food Security and Environmental and Resource Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact