Food and Nutrition Bulletin

2.3k papers and 49.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.3k papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin in the last decades have received a total of 49.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin usually cover Nutrition and Dietetics (1.3k papers), General Health Professions (563 papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (377 papers) specifically the topics of Child Nutrition and Water Access (1.1k papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (474 papers) and Iron Metabolism and Disorders (267 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Food and Nutrition Bulletin are Kenneth H. Brown, Bruno de Benoist, Reynaldo Martorell, Lindsay H. Allen, Marie T. Ruel, Rebecca J. Stoltzfus, Kathryn G. Dewey, Mercedes de Onís, Amalia Waxman and Edward A. Frongillo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin.

Countries where authors publish in Food and Nutrition Bulletin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Food and Nutrition Bulletin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Food and Nutrition Bulletin more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025