Peter E. Knox
Impact in
- Anthropology top 2%
- Classical Antiquity Studies
- Historical and Literary Studies
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Medieval Literature and History
Papers in
- Anthropology 25
- Classical Antiquity Studies 24
- Historical and Literary Studies 4
- Archeology 10
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 10
- Co-authors
- J. P. Sullivan (1 shared paper)Frederick M. Ahl (1 shared paper)William S. Anderson (1 shared paper)Betty Rose Nagle (1 shared paper)Steven P. Pinch (1 shared paper)Ovid (1 shared paper)Andrew M. Kirby (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Classical Quarterly (7 papers)Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (4 papers)Phoenix (2 papers)The Classical Journal (2 papers)The American Journal of Philology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Peter E. Knox
25 papers receiving 139 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Anthropology 234
- Classics 68
- Archeology 117
- General Arts and Humanities 5
- Philosophy 49
Countries citing papers authored by Peter E. Knox
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter E. Knox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter E. Knox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter E. Knox more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter E. Knox
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter E. Knox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter E. Knox. The network helps show where Peter E. Knox may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Peter E. Knox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1994 | 49 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 34 | |
| 3 | 1990 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1985 | 18 | |
| 7 | 1988 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 9 | 1988 | 14 | |
| 10 | 1986 | 9 | |
| 11 | Oxford Readings in Ovid | 2007 | 8 |
| 12 | Developments in public provision and urban policies: an overview and agenda ( USA, UK). | 1983 | 7 |
| 13 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 5 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1984 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 3 |
About Peter E. Knox
Peter E. Knox is a scholar working on Anthropology, Archeology, Philosophy, Classics and Organic Chemistry, having authored 33 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (24 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (10 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (3 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (2 papers) and Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (234 citations), Classics (68 citations), Archeology (117 citations), General Arts and Humanities (5 citations) and Philosophy (49 citations). Peter E. Knox has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J. P. Sullivan, Frederick M. Ahl, William S. Anderson, Betty Rose Nagle, Steven P. Pinch, Ovid and Andrew M. Kirby. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical Quarterly, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology, Phoenix, The Classical Journal and The American Journal of Philology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.