Ovid

951 citations
34 papers · 297 · h-index 8

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 10%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

Ovid

23 papers receiving 143 citations

Peers

Ovid
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Anthropology 225
  • Classics 63
  • Archeology 98
  • Literature and Literary Theory 38
  • Space and Planetary Science 4
Replace Betty Rose Nagle with:
Betty Rose Nagle United States
Gregory W. Dobrov United States
Nicolas P. Gross United States
David Meban Canada
Erika Simon Germany
Peter E. Knox United States
W. Martin Bloomer United States
Joseph B. Solodow United States
Natalie Boymel Kampen
J. C. Bramble
Ovid relative to Betty Rose Nagle United States Betty Rose Nagle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×
Betty Rose Nagle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ovid

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ovid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ovid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ovid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ovid

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ovid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ovid. The network helps show where Ovid may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ovid, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ovid Line = papers co-authored together Ovid links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197470
2
Ovid: Heroides: Select Epistles
199669
3 199840
4 200625
5
The Poems of Exile: Tristia and the Black Sea Letters
199414
6 199710
7 20148
8 20028
9 19987
10 19985
11 19925
12 20125
13 19754
14 19713
15
The Love Books of Ovid Being the Amores, Ars Amatoria, Remedia Amoris and Medicamina Faciei Femineae of Publius Ovidius Naso
20053
16
Epistulae ex Ponto
20053
17 19872
18 19912
19
Art of Love
20102
20 19932

About Ovid

Ovid is a scholar working on Anthropology, Literature and Literary Theory, Archeology, Fuel Technology and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, having authored 34 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (18 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (3 papers), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (2 papers), Diverse Industrial Engineering Technologies (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper) and Linguistics and language evolution (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (225 citations), Classics (63 citations), Archeology (98 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (38 citations) and Space and Planetary Science (4 citations). Frequent co-authors include William Stanley Anderson, Betty Rose Nagle, Nicolas P. Gross, Barbara Weiden Boyd, Paul Murgatroyd, Stephen M. Wheeler, Peter E. Knox, G. Karl Galinsky, James George Frazer and William S. Anderson. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Phoenix, The American Journal of Philology, 能源与动力工程:英文版 and Cambridge University Press eBooks.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact