J. C. Bramble

635 citations
9 papers · 248 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 5%
    • Byzantine Studies and History
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies 5
    • Historical and Literary Studies 1
    • Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 2
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 2
Journals
Greece and Rome (1 paper)The American Journal of Philology (1 paper)Cambridge University Press eBooks (4 papers)Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks (1 paper)Medical Entomology and Zoology (1 paper)

In The Last Decade

J. C. Bramble

7 papers receiving 111 citations

Peers

J. C. Bramble
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Anthropology 198
  • Classics 74
  • Archeology 111
  • Philosophy 69
  • Religious studies 16
Replace Peter E. Knox with:
Peter E. Knox United States
Virgil Virgil
Hans-Peter Stahl
Sergio Casali Italy
Septimius Serenus
Lucius Accius
James H. Dee
Betty Rose Nagle United States
Victoria E. Rimell Italy
Lucan Marcus Annaeus Lucanus
J. C. Bramble relative to Peter E. Knox United States Peter E. Knox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.3×
Peter E. Knox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by J. C. Bramble

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. C. Bramble's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. C. Bramble with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. C. Bramble more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. C. Bramble

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. C. Bramble. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. C. Bramble. The network helps show where J. C. Bramble may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside J. C. Bramble, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with J. C. Bramble Line = papers co-authored together J. C. Bramble links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble
1988183
2 197521
3 198218
4 198216
5 20157
6 19822
7 19741
8 20130
9 19730

About J. C. Bramble

J. C. Bramble is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Archeology, Classics and Visual Arts and Performing Arts, having authored 9 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (2 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Medieval Literature and History (1 paper), Historical and Literary Studies (1 paper), Classical Studies and Legal History (1 paper) and Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (198 citations), Classics (74 citations), Archeology (111 citations), Philosophy (69 citations) and Religious studies (16 citations). Frequent co-authors include Michael Whitby, Mary Whitby, Philip Russell Hardie and Paule Marshall. Their work appears in journals such as Greece and Rome, The American Journal of Philology, Cambridge University Press eBooks, Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact