James H. Dee

484 citations
12 papers · 130 · h-index 6

Impact in

    • Classical Antiquity Studies
    • Historical and Literary Studies
  • Classics top 10%
    • Byzantine Studies and History

Papers in

James H. Dee

8 papers receiving 61 citations

Peers

James H. Dee
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
  • Anthropology 84
  • Classics 16
  • Archeology 27
  • Philosophy 28
  • General Arts and Humanities 2
Replace Anthony T. Edwards with:
Anthony T. Edwards
Cecil W. Wooten United States
William H. Race United States
R. D. Dawe United States
Victor Bers
Seth L. Schein United States
Louise Pratt United States
Bruce Heiden United States
Stephen Scully United States
David Bain United Kingdom
James H. Dee relative to Anthony T. Edwards Anthony T. Edwards's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anthony T. Edwards · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James H. Dee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James H. Dee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James H. Dee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James H. Dee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James H. Dee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James H. Dee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James H. Dee. The network helps show where James H. Dee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside James H. Dee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James H. Dee Line = papers co-authored together James H. Dee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 198645
2 198342
3 199714
4
Black Odysseus, white Caesar: When did "White People" become "White"?
20037
5 19747
6 19785
7 19744
8
Catullus 64 and the Heroic Age: A Reply
19822
9 19842
10
Epitheta hominum apud Homerum = The epithetic phrases for the Homeric heroes : a repertory of descriptive expressions for the human characters of the Iliad and the Odyssey
20001
11
Epitheta deorum apud Homerum : a repertory of the descriptive expressions for the divinities of the Iliad and the Odyssey = The epithetic phrases for the Homeric gods
20011
12 19890

About James H. Dee

James H. Dee is a scholar working on Anthropology, Philosophy, Archeology, Organic Chemistry and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 12 papers that have together received 130 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Antiquity Studies (7 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Ancient Near East History (1 paper), Historical and Architectural Studies (1 paper), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (1 paper), Organic Chemistry Synthesis Methods (1 paper), Ancient Mediterranean Archaeology and History (1 paper) and Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (84 citations), Classics (16 citations), Archeology (27 citations), Philosophy (28 citations) and General Arts and Humanities (2 citations). Frequent co-authors include Seth L. Schein, Gordon Williams, Steven Lowenstam and Ahuvia Kahane. Their work appears in journals such as The Classical World, Transactions of the American Philological Association (1974-), The Classical Journal, The American Journal of Philology and Medical Entomology and Zoology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact