Peter Dorey

1.2k citations
110 papers · 674 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Dorey

91 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers

Peter Dorey
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Public Administration 75
  • Political Science and International Relations 497
  • Finance 100
  • Modeling and Simulation 21
  • History 47
Replace Mark J. Rozell with:
Mark J. Rozell United States
Jennifer Pribble United States
Dorottya Szikra Hungary
Federico Matías Rossi Argentina
Hugh M Bochel United Kingdom
Gregory J. Kasza United States
Alan Deacon United Kingdom
Chris Pierson United Kingdom
Dorota Szelewa Ireland
EDWARD X. GU China
Peter Dorey relative to Mark J. Rozell United States Mark J. Rozell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.3×
Mark J. Rozell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Dorey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Dorey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Dorey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Dorey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Dorey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Dorey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Dorey. The network helps show where Peter Dorey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Dorey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Dorey Line = papers co-authored together Peter Dorey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 110 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200742
2 200540
3 202037
4 201727
5
British Conservatism: The Politics and Philosophy of Inequality
201023
6 200622
7 201622
8 201121
9 201120
10 201720
11 201419
12 201018
13 201116
14 201615
15 200615
16 200913
17
British Politics since 1945
199513
18 200612
19 201012
20 201412

About Peter Dorey

Peter Dorey is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Public Administration, Finance and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 110 papers that have together received 674 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (59 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (14 papers), Political Systems and Governance (13 papers), Irish and British Studies (12 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (7 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers) and COVID-19 epidemiological studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (75 citations), Political Science and International Relations (497 citations), Finance (100 citations), Modeling and Simulation (21 citations) and History (47 citations). Peter Dorey has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Denham, Mark A. Garnett, Hill Kulu, Andrew Roe-Crines, Timothy Heppell, Chris Howell, Alexandra Kelso, Júlia Mikolai, Philip Lynch and Katherine Lisa Keenan. Their work appears in journals such as British Politics, The Political Quarterly, Contemporary British History, Representation and Parliamentary Affairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact