The Political Quarterly

2.6k papers and 18.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in The Political Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 18.1k indexed citations. Papers published in The Political Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), Sociology and Political Science (638 papers) and History (197 papers) specifically the topics of Political and Economic history of UK and US (513 papers), Political Systems and Governance (378 papers) and Irish and British Studies (223 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Political Quarterly are R. A. W. Rhodes, Suzanne Franks, Gerry Stoker, Matthew Goodwin, Colin Crouch, Oliver Heath, Tariq Modood, Andrew Geddes, Elizabeth Meehan and Peter Taylor‐Gooby.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Political Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Political Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Political Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in The Political Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Political Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Political Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Political Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025