Countries where authors publish in The Political Quarterly
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Political Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Political Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Political Quarterly more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Political Quarterly
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Political Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Political Quarterly.
About The Political Quarterly
The 2.7k papers published in The Political Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 20.8k indexed citations . Papers published in The Political Quarterly usually cover Political Science and International Relations (1.3k papers), History (201 papers), Public Administration (66 papers), Sociology and Political Science (654 papers) and Finance (130 papers) specifically the topics of Political and Economic history of UK and US (525 papers), Political Systems and Governance (383 papers), Irish and British Studies (227 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (199 papers), Scottish History and National Identity (173 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (116 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (67 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (65 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Political Quarterly are R. A. W. Rhodes, Suzanne Franks, Gerry Stoker, Matthew Goodwin, Tariq Modood, Colin Crouch, Oliver Heath, Andrew Geddes, Elizabeth Meehan and Stephen Coleman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.