Andrew Denham
Impact in
- Public Administration top 10%
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Policy Transfer and Learning
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements
Papers in
-
- Political and Economic history of UK and US 19
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation 8
- Social Policy and Reform Studies 7
-
- Irish and British Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Mark Garnett (9 shared papers)Peter Dorey (10 shared papers)Diane Stone (1 shared paper)Kieron O’Hara (1 shared paper)Andrew S. Crines (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Political Quarterly (7 papers)British Politics (6 papers)Parliamentary Affairs (3 papers)Representation (1 paper)Journal of Political Ideologies (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIran
In The Last Decade
Andrew Denham
30 papers receiving 293 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Public Administration 39
- Political Science and International Relations 257
- Strategy and Management 85
- Finance 52
- Gender Studies 35
Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Denham
This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Denham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Denham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Denham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Denham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Denham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Denham. The network helps show where Andrew Denham may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Andrew Denham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Think tanks across nations : a comparative approach | 1998 | 72 |
| 2 | 2005 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2016 | 23 | |
| 4 | 2001 | 21 | |
| 5 | 1996 | 19 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 7 | Think-tanks of the New Right | 1996 | 19 |
| 8 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 13 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 10 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2006 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2017 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 4 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2 |
About Andrew Denham
Andrew Denham is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Public Administration, Gender Studies and Strategy and Management, having authored 30 papers that have together received 340 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political and Economic history of UK and US (19 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (8 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), Irish and British Studies (4 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (2 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (2 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (1 paper) and Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (39 citations), Political Science and International Relations (257 citations), Strategy and Management (85 citations), Finance (52 citations) and Gender Studies (35 citations). Andrew Denham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Mark Garnett, Peter Dorey, Diane Stone, Kieron O’Hara and Andrew S. Crines. Their work appears in journals such as The Political Quarterly, British Politics, Parliamentary Affairs, Representation and Journal of Political Ideologies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.