Countries where authors publish in British Politics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in British Politics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in British Politics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites British Politics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in British Politics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in British Politics.
About British Politics
The 541 papers published in British Politics in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in British Politics usually cover Political Science and International Relations (412 papers), Public Administration (34 papers), Finance (69 papers), Gender Studies (61 papers) and Communication (28 papers) specifically the topics of Political and Economic history of UK and US (261 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (183 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (101 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (67 papers), Irish and British Studies (66 papers), Political Systems and Governance (65 papers), Gender Politics and Representation (46 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in British Politics are Paul Cairney, Colin Crouch, John Street, Michael Higgins, Matthew Flinders, Jim Buller, Peter Dorey, Ben Clements, Stuart McAnulla and Philip Lynch.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.