Peter D. Hurd

31 papers receiving 317 citations

Peers

Peter D. Hurd
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 70
  • Family Practice 31
  • Speech and Hearing 50
  • Applied Psychology 33
  • General Health Professions 112
Replace Kentya H. Ford with:
Kentya H. Ford United States
Carina Katigbak United States
Wayne Mitic Canada
Kelly Doran United States
Jennifer Danielson United States
Susie Adams United States
Mary R. Haack United States
Heather F. McClintock United States
Jiraporn Kespichayawattana Thailand
Jeffrey A. Morzinski United States
Peter D. Hurd relative to Kentya H. Ford United States Kentya H. Ford's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.2×
Kentya H. Ford · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Hurd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Hurd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Hurd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Hurd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Hurd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Hurd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Hurd. The network helps show where Peter D. Hurd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Hurd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Hurd Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Hurd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980164
2 198631
3 201225
4 199522
5 201321
6 201414
7 199012
8
Compliance problems and the older patient
198611
9 19949
10 19995
11 20015
12 19854
13 20144
14
Introduction to Public Health in Pharmacy
20074
15
The effects of aging and diabetes on the perception of medication color
19893
16 20183
17 19853
18 19823
19 20163
20 19983

About Peter D. Hurd

Peter D. Hurd is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Education, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 366 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (11 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (2 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (2 papers) and Smoking Behavior and Cessation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (70 citations), Family Practice (31 citations), Speech and Hearing (50 citations), Applied Psychology (33 citations) and General Health Professions (112 citations). Peter D. Hurd has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David R. Jacobs, Russell V. Luepker, Terry F. Pechacek, C. Anderson Johnson, Gloria R. Grice, Tricia M. Berry, Marion Slack, Julie A. Murphy, Brenda L. Gleason and Andrew J. Crannage. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Journal of the American Pharmacists Association and New Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact