Peter D. Hurd

31 papers receiving 335 citations

Peers

Peter D. Hurd
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 51
  • Family Practice 25
  • Speech and Hearing 46
  • Applied Psychology 30
  • General Health Professions 108
Replace Sigrid Wangensteen with:
Sigrid Wangensteen Norway
Kentya H. Ford United States
Mary R. Haack United States
Kathleen Blais United States
Katherine Toder United States
Jeffrey A. Morzinski United States
Wayne Mitic Canada
RuthAnne Kuiper United States
Roger Thomas Canada
Heather F. McClintock United States
Peter D. Hurd relative to Sigrid Wangensteen Norway Sigrid Wangensteen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×9.2×
Sigrid Wangensteen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter D. Hurd

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter D. Hurd's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter D. Hurd with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter D. Hurd more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter D. Hurd

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter D. Hurd. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter D. Hurd. The network helps show where Peter D. Hurd may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter D. Hurd, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter D. Hurd Line = papers co-authored together Peter D. Hurd links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980180
2 198632
3 201227
4 201323
5 199522
6 199014
7 201414
8
Compliance problems and the older patient
198612
9 199410
10 19995
11 20015
12 20164
13
The effects of aging and diabetes on the perception of medication color
19894
14 20144
15 19854
16
Introduction to Public Health in Pharmacy
20074
17 20183
18 19983
19 19823
20 19853

About Peter D. Hurd

Peter D. Hurd is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 32 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (7 papers), Pharmacy and Medical Practices (2 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (2 papers), Color perception and design (1 paper), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (1 paper), Social and Behavioral Studies (1 paper) and Educational Games and Gamification (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (51 citations), Family Practice (25 citations), Speech and Hearing (46 citations), Applied Psychology (30 citations) and General Health Professions (108 citations). Peter D. Hurd has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Japan and Pakistan. Frequent co-authors include Terry F. Pechacek, David R. Jacobs, Russell V. Luepker, C. Anderson Johnson, Gloria R. Grice, Tricia M. Berry, Marion Slack, J. Lyle Bootman, Claude J. Gaebelein and Brenda L. Gleason. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, Journal of Behavioral Medicine, Patient Education and Counseling and New Forests.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact