Peter Currie
Impact in
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
-
- Heart Failure Treatment and Management
- Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Papers in
-
- Ethics in Clinical Research 3
- Health and Medical Research Impacts 1
-
- Diverse Education Studies and Reforms 1
- Co-authors
- Anne West (3 shared papers)Jane Lewis (1 shared paper)Clyde W. Yancy (1 shared paper)Bárbara Riegel (1 shared paper)Renee Smith (1 shared paper)Harlan M. Krumholz (1 shared paper)Christopher O. Phillips (1 shared paper)Eric D. Peterson (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Educational Studies (1 paper)Journal of Youth Studies (1 paper)Circulation (1 paper)Policy & Politics (1 paper)IRB Ethics and Human Research (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Peter Currie
8 papers receiving 391 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Communication 79
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99
- Family Practice 7
- Sociology and Political Science 150
- Geriatrics and Gerontology 9
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Currie
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Currie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Currie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Currie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Currie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Currie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Currie. The network helps show where Peter Currie may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Peter Currie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2006 | 220 | |
| 2 | 2009 | 166 | |
| 3 | 2008 | 19 | |
| 4 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 6 | A study to evaluate the effect of investigator attendance on the efficiency of IRB review. | 2008 | 6 |
| 7 | Factors that influence institutional review board members' commitment to their role responsibilities. | 2009 | 3 |
| 8 | Restricting Access to Unapproved Drugs: A Compelling Government Interest | 2007 | 2 |
About Peter Currie
Peter Currie is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Education, Communication, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 8 papers that have together received 444 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (3 papers), Science, Research, and Medicine (1 paper), Global Educational Policies and Reforms (1 paper), Diverse Education Studies and Reforms (1 paper), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (1 paper), Health and Medical Research Impacts (1 paper), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (1 paper) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (79 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (99 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Sociology and Political Science (150 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (9 citations). Peter Currie has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Anne West, Jane Lewis, Clyde W. Yancy, Bárbara Riegel, Renee Smith, Harlan M. Krumholz, Christopher O. Phillips, Eric D. Peterson, David P. Faxon and Holly A. Taylor. Their work appears in journals such as Educational Studies, Journal of Youth Studies, Circulation, Policy & Politics and IRB Ethics and Human Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.