Peter Collingbourne
Impact in
- Hardware and Architecture top 5%
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
- Software top 5%
- Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
Papers in
-
- Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques 5
- VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing 1
-
- Logic, programming, and type systems 2
- Security and Verification in Computing 2
- Co-authors
- Paul H. J. Kelly (4 shared papers)Cristian Cadar (3 shared papers)Úlfar Erlingsson (1 shared paper)Geoff Pike (1 shared paper)Tom Roeder (1 shared paper)Stephen Checkoway (1 shared paper)Alastair F. Donaldson (2 shared papers)Jeroen Ketema (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (1 paper)Lecture notes in computer science (3 papers)Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Peter Collingbourne
7 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 18
- Hardware and Architecture 186
- Software 99
- Signal Processing 156
- Artificial Intelligence 232
- Computer Networks and Communications 99
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Collingbourne
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Collingbourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Collingbourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Collingbourne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Collingbourne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Collingbourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Collingbourne. The network helps show where Peter Collingbourne may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Peter Collingbourne, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Enforcing forward-edge control-flow integrity in GCC & LLVM | 2014 | 180 |
| 2 | 2011 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 49 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 33 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 29 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 4 |
About Peter Collingbourne
Peter Collingbourne is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 7 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (5 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (2 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (2 papers), Security and Verification in Computing (2 papers), Cloud Data Security Solutions (1 paper), Cloud Computing and Resource Management (1 paper), Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (1 paper) and VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (186 citations), Software (99 citations), Signal Processing (156 citations), Artificial Intelligence (232 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (99 citations). Peter Collingbourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Paul H. J. Kelly, Cristian Cadar, Úlfar Erlingsson, Geoff Pike, Tom Roeder, Stephen Checkoway, Alastair F. Donaldson, Jeroen Ketema, Shaz Qadeer and Nathan Chong. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Lecture notes in computer science and Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.