Peter Chlebo

22 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Peter Chlebo
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
  • Biochemistry 105
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 55
  • Food Science 117
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 61
  • Plant Science 134
Replace João Bernardo with:
João Bernardo Portugal
Zulkhairi Amom Malaysia
Irena Landeka Jurčević Croatia
Jin Song South Korea
Isabella Calzuola Italy
S. Sudheesh India
Hafza Fasiha Zahid Australia
Bachra Khettal Algeria
Yuxuan Liang China
Elżbieta Wójtowicz Poland
Peter Chlebo relative to João Bernardo Portugal João Bernardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
João Bernardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Chlebo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Chlebo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Chlebo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Chlebo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Chlebo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Chlebo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Chlebo. The network helps show where Peter Chlebo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Chlebo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Chlebo Line = papers co-authored together Peter Chlebo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007102
2 201643
3 200940
4 202125
5 201424
6 201423
7 201819
8 201915
9 201813
10 20229
11 20099
12 20229
13 20208
14 20218
15 20185
16 20153
17 20133
18
Influence of consumption of pork enriched by organic selenium on selenium level in blood serum and selected blood lipid parameters in consumers.
20172
19
Risk in Nutrition Habits of Slovak Population
20102
20 20212

About Peter Chlebo

Peter Chlebo is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 367 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Nuts composition and effects (3 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (3 papers), Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (2 papers) and Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (105 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (55 citations), Food Science (117 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (61 citations) and Plant Science (134 citations). Peter Chlebo has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Miroslav Habán, Jozef Hudec, Alena Vollmannová, Marianna Schwarzová, Helena Frančáková, Grigorij Kogan, Tatiana Bojňanská, Marta Habánová, J. Gažo and Jorge A. Saraiva. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and Foods.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact