Peter Chlebo

466 citations
24 papers · 395 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Chlebo

22 papers receiving 364 citations

Peers

Peter Chlebo
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Biochemistry 116
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 61
  • Food Science 126
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 66
  • Plant Science 143
Replace João Bernardo with:
João Bernardo Portugal
Irena Landeka Jurčević Croatia
Zulkhairi Amom Malaysia
Sudhakaran Sudheesh India
Isabella Calzuola Italy
Hafza Fasiha Zahid Australia
Ping Geng United States
Asmaa M. Otify Egypt
Jin Song South Korea
Magali Chohan United Kingdom
Peter Chlebo relative to João Bernardo Portugal João Bernardo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
João Bernardo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Chlebo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Chlebo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Chlebo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Chlebo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Chlebo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Chlebo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Chlebo. The network helps show where Peter Chlebo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Chlebo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Chlebo Line = papers co-authored together Peter Chlebo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007105
2 201647
3 200944
4 201430
5 202126
6 201424
7 201821
8 201816
9 201915
10 202210
11 200910
12 202210
13 20219
14 20208
15 20184
16 20133
17 20153
18 20102
19 20212
20
Influence of consumption of pork enriched by organic selenium on selenium level in blood serum and selected blood lipid parameters in consumers.
20172

About Peter Chlebo

Peter Chlebo is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Pharmacology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 395 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (4 papers), Fungal Biology and Applications (3 papers), Diet, Metabolism, and Disease (3 papers), Nuts composition and effects (3 papers), Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies (3 papers), Ginger and Zingiberaceae research (2 papers) and Cassava research and cyanide (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (116 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (61 citations), Food Science (126 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (66 citations) and Plant Science (143 citations). Peter Chlebo has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Poland and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Miroslav Habán, Alena Vollmannová, Jozef Hudec, Marianna Schwarzová, Helena Frančáková, Grigorij Kogan, Tatiana Bojňanská, Marta Habánová, Oľga Grygorieva and Ján Brindza. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part B, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Journal of Fungi and Applied Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact