Peter C. Griffiths

5.9k citations
166 papers · 5.0k · h-index 41

Impact in

Papers in

Peter C. Griffiths

164 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Peter C. Griffiths
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Biomaterials 1.3k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 459
  • Organic Chemistry 2.0k
  • Molecular Medicine 303
  • Filtration and Separation 108
Replace Dganit Danino with:
Dganit Danino Israel
Katarina Edwards Sweden
Michel H. J. Koch Germany
Tommy Nylander Sweden
Gerardino D’Errico Italy
Bo Nyström Norway
Yoshio Okahata Japan
Vesselin N. Paunov United Kingdom
Michael Gradzielski Germany
Patrick Garidel Germany
Peter C. Griffiths relative to Dganit Danino Israel Dganit Danino's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Dganit Danino · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter C. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter C. Griffiths's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter C. Griffiths with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter C. Griffiths more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter C. Griffiths

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter C. Griffiths. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter C. Griffiths. The network helps show where Peter C. Griffiths may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter C. Griffiths, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter C. Griffiths Line = papers co-authored together Peter C. Griffiths links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 166 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013244
2 1996172
3 2005168
4 2014149
5 2015121
6 2015121
7 2008113
8 2014103
9 2015101
10 200699
11 201183
12 201581
13 199871
14 201670
15 199969
16 199569
17 200468
18 200366
19 200465
20 200064

About Peter C. Griffiths

Peter C. Griffiths is a scholar working on Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 166 papers that have together received 5.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Surfactants and Colloidal Systems (52 papers), NMR spectroscopy and applications (28 papers), Advanced Polymer Synthesis and Characterization (20 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (17 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (12 papers), Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (11 papers), Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials (11 papers) and Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biomaterials (1.3k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (459 citations), Organic Chemistry (2.0k citations), Molecular Medicine (303 citations) and Filtration and Separation (108 citations). Peter C. Griffiths has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, France and United States. Frequent co-authors include Alison Paul, Peter Stilbs, Beatrice Cattoz, Stephen M. King, Richard K. Heenan, Andrew M. Howe, Dave J. Adams, Terence Cosgrove, Ian A. Fallis and Barney L. Bales. Their work appears in journals such as Langmuir, Soft Matter, International Journal of Pharmaceutics, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science and The Journal of Physical Chemistry B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact