Peter Brooks

496 citations
30 papers · 185 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Brooks

23 papers receiving 141 citations

Peers

Peter Brooks
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Law 56
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
  • Cultural Studies 15
  • Anthropology 18
  • Political Science and International Relations 43
Replace Todd Herzog with:
Todd Herzog United States
Şehnaz Tahir Gürçağlar Türkiye
Sharon Sliwinski Canada
Penny Florence India
Anshuman A. Mondal United Kingdom
Hein Willemse South Africa
Fernand de Varennes Australia
Stephen Clingman United States
Laurence J. Silberstein United States
William Rothman United States
Peter Brooks relative to Todd Herzog United States Todd Herzog's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Todd Herzog · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Brooks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Brooks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Brooks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Brooks. The network helps show where Peter Brooks may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Peter Brooks, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Brooks Line = papers co-authored together Peter Brooks links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200159
2
Narrative Transactions - Does the Law Need a Narratology?
200627
3 200718
4 200215
5 20088
6 20107
7 20026
8 19945
9 20175
10
Literature as Law's Other
20104
11 19954
12 19974
13 19864
14 19823
15 19733
16 20052
17 20172
18 20031
19 20131
20 20161

About Peter Brooks

Peter Brooks is a scholar working on Law, Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Clinical Psychology and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 185 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Law in Society and Culture (13 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (8 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (2 papers), Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (1 paper), Diverse Cultural and Historical Studies (1 paper) and Rhetoric and Communication Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Law (56 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations), Cultural Studies (15 citations), Anthropology (18 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (43 citations). Peter Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Austin Sarat, Martin H. Redish, Fredrick E. Vars, Marianne Constable, Richard A. Posner, Danielle Allen, Louis Michael Seidman, Paul Horwitz and Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan. Their work appears in journals such as PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, Comparative Literature, ELH, Romantisme and Narrative.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact