Peter Branney

47 papers receiving 484 citations

Peers

Peter Branney
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Gender Studies 64
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 44
  • General Psychology 7
  • General Health Professions 121
  • Pharmacy 20
Replace Laura E. Hirshfield with:
Laura E. Hirshfield United States
Frank Houghton Ireland
Catherine M. Jones United Kingdom
Jennifer Baxter Australia
Alison T. Wynn United Kingdom
C J Bland United States
R. R. Dale United Kingdom
Michael Bloor United Kingdom
Peter Wimpenny United Kingdom
Ghazala Mir United Kingdom
Peter Branney relative to Laura E. Hirshfield United States Laura E. Hirshfield's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Laura E. Hirshfield · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Branney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Branney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Branney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Branney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Branney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Branney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Branney. The network helps show where Peter Branney may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Branney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Branney Line = papers co-authored together Peter Branney links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200877
2 201339
3
The Gender and Access to Health Services Study: Final Report
200832
4
People in Public Health - a study of approaches to develop and support people in public health roles
201031
5 201426
6 201924
7 201321
8 201919
9 200916
10 200816
11 201316
12 202316
13 201114
14 201213
15 201312
16 201111
17 202211
18 201411
19 20249
20 20189

About Peter Branney

Peter Branney is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies, having authored 54 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genital Health and Disease (9 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Data Analysis and Archiving (5 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (4 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers), Workplace Health and Well-being (4 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (4 papers) and Public Health Policies and Education (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (64 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (44 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), General Health Professions (121 citations) and Pharmacy (20 citations). Peter Branney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Alan White, Jane South, Ian Eardley, Karina Kinsella, Angela Meah, Julie Evans, Sarah Payne, David Wilkins, Judy White and Anne‐Marie Bagnall. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Research in Psychology, Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Health Promotion International, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact