Michael Bloor
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Papers in
-
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 1
-
- Sex work and related issues 1
- Risk Perception and Management 1
- Co-authors
- Jane Frankland (1 shared paper)Roisin Pill (4 shared papers)Martin Read (1 shared paper)Kerenza Hood (2 shared papers)Ian Russell (2 shared papers)Judith Covey (2 shared papers)C.H. Batchelor (1 shared paper)Clare Wilkinson (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Family Practice (2 papers)European Journal of Epidemiology (1 paper)Drugs of today (1 paper)European Journal of Public Health (1 paper)Medical Decision Making (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael Bloor
10 papers receiving 473 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- Medical Terminology 2
- General Health Professions 153
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 37
- Family Practice 5
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 14
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bloor
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bloor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bloor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bloor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bloor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bloor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bloor. The network helps show where Michael Bloor may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bloor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Focus groups in social research: Introducing qualitative methods | 2001 | 175 |
| 2 | 2000 | 136 | |
| 3 | 1994 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1998 | 35 | |
| 6 | 1998 | 29 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 19 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 6 | |
| 10 | A school-based, peer-led anti-smoking intervention that appears to work: a stop smoking in schools trial, England and Wales, 2001-2005 | 2005 | 1 |
| 11 | Qualitative Studies in Health and Medicine | 1994 | 1 |
About Michael Bloor
Michael Bloor is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 11 papers that have together received 519 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers), HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (1 paper), Youth Development and Social Support (1 paper), Sex work and related issues (1 paper), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (1 paper), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (1 paper), Risk Perception and Management (1 paper) and School Health and Nursing Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (2 citations), General Health Professions (153 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (37 citations), Family Practice (5 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (14 citations). Michael Bloor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jane Frankland, Roisin Pill, Martin Read, Kerenza Hood, Ian Russell, Judith Covey, C.H. Batchelor, Clare Wilkinson, David Owens and Nigel Stott. Their work appears in journals such as Family Practice, European Journal of Epidemiology, Drugs of today, European Journal of Public Health and Medical Decision Making.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.