Peter Boord

1.5k citations
26 papers · 1.2k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Boord

26 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Peter Boord
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 601
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 338
  • Human-Computer Interaction 88
  • Occupational Therapy 36
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 184
Replace Reza Khosrowabadi with:
Reza Khosrowabadi Iran
Daniel J. Levendowski United States
Pierrick J. Arnal France
Christian Herff Germany
Kelvin S. Oie United States
Scott E. Kerick United States
Aleksandra Vučković United Kingdom
Hugo F. Posada–Quintero United States
Nicholas C. Swenson United States
Ivo Käthner Germany
Peter Boord relative to Reza Khosrowabadi Iran Reza Khosrowabadi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Reza Khosrowabadi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Boord

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Boord's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Boord with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Boord more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Boord

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Boord. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Boord. The network helps show where Peter Boord may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Boord, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Boord Line = papers co-authored together Peter Boord links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003293
2 2007141
3 2005101
4 201474
5 201570
6
The efficacy and benefits of environmental control systems for the severely disabled.
200564
7 200463
8 200752
9 200449
10 201546
11 201640
12 200536
13 201031
14 200629
15 200728
16 200726
17 201816
18 201714
19 201313
20 200413

About Peter Boord

Peter Boord is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 26 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (10 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (4 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (601 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (338 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (88 citations), Occupational Therapy (36 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (184 citations). Peter Boord has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Ashley Craig, Yvonne Tran, Hung T. Nguyen, Lal S, Les Kirkup, Mary K. Askren, James Middleton, Thomas J. Grabowski, Tara Madhyastha and Nirupama Wijesuriya. Their work appears in journals such as Spinal Cord, NeuroImage Clinical, Movement Disorders, Biological Psychology and Neurobiology of Aging.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact