Peter Ames

2.2k citations
30 papers · 1.8k · h-index 23

Impact in

Papers in

    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 12
    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 5
    • Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing 3
    • Gene Regulatory Network Analysis 3
    • Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology 21

Peter Ames

30 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Peter Ames
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Endocrinology 204
  • Genetics 902
  • Structural Biology 41
  • Molecular Biology 1.2k
  • Molecular Medicine 76
Replace May Kihara with:
May Kihara United States
Koushik Paul United States
Yu‐Ling Shih Taiwan
Kristin Wuichet United States
Janine R. Maddock United States
Axel Müller United States
Daisuke Shiomi Japan
Norbert O. E. Vischer Netherlands
Davi R. Ortega United States
Lucille Shapiro United States
Peter Ames relative to May Kihara United States May Kihara's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
May Kihara · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Ames

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Ames more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Ames

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Ames. The network helps show where Peter Ames may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Ames, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Ames Line = papers co-authored together Peter Ames links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002295
2 2005138
3 1994131
4 1981120
5 1988118
6 2009112
7 1987104
8 198482
9 201179
10 198574
11 199663
12 200856
13 201353
14 198050
15 202050
16 197944
17 201338
18 201137
19 200635
20 198433

About Peter Ames

Peter Ames is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Endocrinology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (21 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (12 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (5 papers), Cellular transport and secretion (3 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers), Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing (3 papers) and Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (204 citations), Genetics (902 citations), Structural Biology (41 citations), Molecular Biology (1.2k citations) and Molecular Medicine (76 citations). Peter Ames has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include John S. Parkinson, Claudia A. Studdert, Qin Zhou, Gerald B. Pier, K. Bergman, Danielle Desjardins, Yong Yu, Smiljka Kitanovic, David P. Speert and H S Auerbach. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Bacteriology, Molecular Microbiology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact