Peter Aczel

2.4k citations
26 papers · 599 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Aczel

22 papers receiving 528 citations

Peers

Peter Aczel
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 322
  • Mathematical Physics 133
  • Artificial Intelligence 410
  • Theoretical Computer Science 13
  • Geometry and Topology 93
Replace J. L. Bell with:
J. L. Bell Canada
J. Donald Monk United States
Steven Givant United States
Roy Dyckhoff United Kingdom
Yiannis N. Moschovakis United States
Heinz-Dieter Ebbinghaus Germany
Jouko Väänánen Finland
Erik Palmgren Sweden
C. Smoryński United States
Kosta Došen Serbia
Peter Aczel relative to J. L. Bell Canada J. L. Bell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
J. L. Bell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Aczel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Aczel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Aczel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Aczel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Aczel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Aczel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Aczel. The network helps show where Peter Aczel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Peter Aczel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Aczel Line = papers co-authored together Peter Aczel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Non-well-founded sets
1988344
2 200369
3 200543
4 200124
5 200617
6 200115
7
The Strength of Martin-Löf's Intuitionistic Type Theory with One Universe
198413
8 19729
9 19708
10 20066
11 20096
12 19966
13 20086
14 19666
15 19815
16
Proof Theory: A selection of papers from the Leeds Proof Theory Programme 1990
19935
17 20145
18
Proof Theory
20083
19
Situation Theory and its Applications, Volume 3
19932
20 20032

About Peter Aczel

Peter Aczel is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 26 papers that have together received 599 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, programming, and type systems (13 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (8 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (8 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (6 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (4 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (3 papers), semigroups and automata theory (3 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (322 citations), Mathematical Physics (133 citations), Artificial Intelligence (410 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (13 citations) and Geometry and Topology (93 citations). Peter Aczel has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jiřı́ Adámek, Jiřı́ Velebil, Stefan Milius, Nicola Gambino, Jouko Väänánen, John N. Crossley, Pavel Janoš, Stanley S. Wainer, Hajime Ishihara and Harold Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, Studia Logica, Mathematical Structures in Computer Science, Journal of Symbolic Logic and Theoretical Computer Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact