Peter A. Loeb

1.6k citations
56 papers · 757 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Peter A. Loeb

47 papers receiving 574 citations

Peers

Peter A. Loeb
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
  • Mathematical Physics 520
  • Theoretical Computer Science 56
  • Geometry and Topology 282
  • Applied Mathematics 210
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 263
Replace W. A. J. Luxemburg with:
W. A. J. Luxemburg United States
Azriel Lévy Israel
C. Ward Henson United States
C. Ryll–Nardzewski Poland
Manfred Wolff Germany
Thomas Jech United States
Karel Prikry United States
Robert L. Vaught United States
James Ax United States
Michael Rosen United States
Peter A. Loeb relative to W. A. J. Luxemburg United States W. A. J. Luxemburg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
W. A. J. Luxemburg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter A. Loeb

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter A. Loeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter A. Loeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter A. Loeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter A. Loeb

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter A. Loeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter A. Loeb. The network helps show where Peter A. Loeb may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Peter A. Loeb, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter A. Loeb Line = papers co-authored together Peter A. Loeb links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975193
2 197559
3 200057
4 196534
5 196629
6 200629
7 199428
8 199422
9 200920
10 197918
11 196518
12 197617
13 197116
14 196715
15 196515
16 201513
17 197313
18 199212
19 200711
20 196710

About Peter A. Loeb

Peter A. Loeb is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Geometry and Topology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 56 papers that have together received 757 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (32 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (13 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (8 papers), Mathematics and Applications (8 papers), Functional Equations Stability Results (7 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (7 papers) and Advanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Mathematical Physics (520 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (56 citations), Geometry and Topology (282 citations), Applied Mathematics (210 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (263 citations). Peter A. Loeb has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Manfred Wolff, Yeneng Sun, Zoltán Füredi, Jürgen Bliedtner, Donald J. Brown and J. M. Aldaz. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Annales de l’institut Fourier, Israel Journal of Mathematics and Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact