Pete Daniel
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Race, History, and American Society 18
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 4
-
- American History and Culture 5
- Co-authors
- James H. Jones (1 shared paper)Donald Holley (1 shared paper)James C. Cobb (2 shared papers)William Ivy Hair (1 shared paper)Gilbert C. Fite (1 shared paper)R.C. Cochran (1 shared paper)C. Vann Woodward (1 shared paper)Loren Schweninger (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Southern History (12 papers)Journal of American History (9 papers)The American Historical Review (8 papers)Technology and Culture (3 papers)American Quarterly (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Pete Daniel
44 papers receiving 482 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- Music 33
- Marketing 81
- Sociology and Political Science 323
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59
- History 67
Countries citing papers authored by Pete Daniel
This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Daniel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Daniel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Daniel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pete Daniel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Daniel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Daniel. The network helps show where Pete Daniel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 20 scholars most cited alongside Pete Daniel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1982 | 172 | |
| 2 | 1986 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1986 | 45 | |
| 4 | 1985 | 38 | |
| 5 | 1973 | 38 | |
| 6 | 2001 | 36 | |
| 7 | Official Images: New Deal Photography | 1987 | 35 |
| 8 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 9 | 1987 | 25 | |
| 10 | 1973 | 19 | |
| 11 | African American Farmers and Civil Rights | 2007 | 15 |
| 12 | 1991 | 14 | |
| 13 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 14 | Breaking the Land | 1985 | 13 |
| 15 | 1998 | 11 | |
| 16 | The shadow of slavery | 1972 | 11 |
| 17 | 1973 | 11 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1979 | 9 |
About Pete Daniel
Pete Daniel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Marketing, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, General Agricultural and Biological Sciences and History, having authored 49 papers that have together received 715 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Race, History, and American Society (18 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Photography and Visual Culture (2 papers), American Political and Social Dynamics (1 paper) and African history and culture studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Music (33 citations), Marketing (81 citations), Sociology and Political Science (323 citations), General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (59 citations) and History (67 citations). Pete Daniel has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James H. Jones, Donald Holley, James C. Cobb, William Ivy Hair, Gilbert C. Fite, R.C. Cochran, C. Vann Woodward, Loren Schweninger, Lawrence J. Friedman and John Dittmer. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Southern History, Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, Technology and Culture and American Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.