Pedro Clemente
Impact in
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Forest Management and Policy
-
- Urban Green Space and Health
Papers in
-
- Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management 6
- Land Use and Ecosystem Services 5
- Forest Management and Policy 3
-
- Economic and Environmental Valuation 4
- Co-authors
- Paula Antunes (8 shared papers)Rui Santos (8 shared papers)Irene Ring (4 shared papers)Maria João Martins (1 shared paper)Jorge Orestes Cerdeira (1 shared paper)Christoph Schröter‐Schlaack (2 shared papers)Roy Brouwer (2 shared papers)Rute Pinto (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Environmental Conservation (2 papers)Ecological Economics (1 paper)Ecological Indicators (1 paper)Land Use Policy (1 paper)Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PortugalGermanyNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Pedro Clemente
9 papers receiving 333 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Global and Planetary Change 236
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 79
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 67
- Economics and Econometrics 134
- Ecological Modeling 17
Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Clemente
This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Clemente's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Clemente with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Clemente more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Clemente
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Clemente. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Clemente. The network helps show where Pedro Clemente may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pedro Clemente, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 125 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 51 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 17 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 7 |
About Pedro Clemente
Pedro Clemente is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 9 papers that have together received 343 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (6 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (5 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (4 papers), Forest Management and Policy (3 papers), Environmental Conservation and Management (2 papers), Plant and animal studies (1 paper), Urban Planning and Valuation (1 paper) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (236 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (79 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (67 citations), Economics and Econometrics (134 citations) and Ecological Modeling (17 citations). Pedro Clemente has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paula Antunes, Rui Santos, Irene Ring, Maria João Martins, Jorge Orestes Cerdeira, Christoph Schröter‐Schlaack, Roy Brouwer, Rute Pinto, Grazia Zulian and João Fernandes. Their work appears in journals such as Environmental Conservation, Ecological Economics, Ecological Indicators, Land Use Policy and Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.