Paul Stephens

42 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers

Paul Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Business and International Management 118
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 337
  • Equine 64
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 200
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 86
Replace Mikko Apiola with:
Mikko Apiola Finland
Nermin Eyuboglu United States
Zhang Chun United States
Benjamin S. Baumer United States
William David Tucker South Africa
Lin Xiao China
Harry N. Boone United States
Cathleen A. McGrath United States
Deborah A. Boone United States
James J. Cochran United States
Paul Stephens relative to Mikko Apiola Finland Mikko Apiola's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×15×20×25×
Mikko Apiola · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Stephens. The network helps show where Paul Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Paul Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006222
2 2006134
3 1989115
4 200458
5 200521
6 200921
7 200120
8 200919
9 200913
10 200513
11 198112
12 202511
13 200611
14 200711
15 200510
16 200610
17 199010
18 20079
19 20039
20 20068

About Paul Stephens

Paul Stephens is a scholar working on Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Signal Processing and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 58 papers that have together received 801 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital and Cyber Forensics (9 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (9 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (6 papers), Spacecraft Design and Technology (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (3 papers), Information and Cyber Security (3 papers) and Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (118 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (337 citations), Equine (64 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (200 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (86 citations). Paul Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Howard Van Auken, Fred L. Fry, David M. Nunamaker, Jaime Carvalho e Silva, James R. Evans, Alex da Silva Curiel, Wei Sun, Martin N. Sweeting, David J. Bennett and Alastair D. Irons. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Veterinary Research, Arizona quarterly/˜The œArizona quarterly, Twentieth Century Literature, Business Horizons and Digital Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact