Paul Needham

92 papers receiving 804 citations

Peers

Paul Needham
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • History and Philosophy of Science 343
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 204
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 144
  • Philosophy 70
  • Theoretical Computer Science 7
Replace Mary Jo Nye with:
Mary Jo Nye United States
Joseph D. Sneed United States
Colin Howson United Kingdom
C. Ulises Moulines Germany
C. A. Hooker Canada
Paul Oppenheim United States
Michela Massimi United Kingdom
Anjan Chakravartty United States
James W. McAllister Netherlands
Theo A. F. Kuipers Netherlands
Paul Needham relative to Mary Jo Nye United States Mary Jo Nye's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.3×
Mary Jo Nye · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Needham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Needham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Needham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Needham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Needham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Needham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Needham. The network helps show where Paul Needham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Needham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Needham Line = papers co-authored together Paul Needham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 106 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200389
2 197985
3 200068
4 200240
5 201139
6 200239
7 200236
8 200532
9 201226
10 200819
11 200418
12 200517
13
Temporal Intervals and Temporal Order
198117
14 199816
15 200215
16 200914
17 200713
18 200713
19 200413
20 201313

About Paul Needham

Paul Needham is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Information Systems, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Classics, having authored 106 papers that have together received 965 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (33 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (25 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Research Data Management Practices (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (5 papers), Library Science and Administration (4 papers), History of Science and Medicine (4 papers) and Origins and Evolution of Life (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (343 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (204 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (144 citations), Philosophy (70 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (7 citations). Paul Needham has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan J. Evans, Barbara A. Wilson, Lars Lindahl, R. F. Atkinson, W. Huw Williams, Robin Findlay Hendry, Barbara A. Wilson, Charles Oppenheim, Alma Swan and Steve Probets. Their work appears in journals such as The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact