Paul Needham

110 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Paul Needham
Comparison fields: 5 of 157
  • History and Philosophy of Science 467
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 314
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 179
  • Philosophy 128
  • Classics 39
Replace C. A. Hooker with:
C. A. Hooker Canada
Theo A. F. Kuipers Netherlands
Don Howard United States
Robert E. Schofield United States
Carol L. Smith United States
Peter J. Lewis United States
William Harper Canada
Jan‐Willem Romeijn Netherlands
Frederik Müller Netherlands
Georgios Tsaparlis Greece
Paul Needham relative to C. A. Hooker Canada C. A. Hooker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5×10×12.6×
C. A. Hooker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Needham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Needham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Needham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Needham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Needham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Needham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Needham. The network helps show where Paul Needham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Paul Needham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Needham Line = papers co-authored together Paul Needham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 134 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2003131
2 1979124
3 200078
4 201150
5 200249
6 200243
7 200240
8 200237
9 200536
10 200534
11 200832
12 201230
13 200427
14
Temporal Intervals and Temporal Order
198124
15
Johann Gutenberg and his Bible; a historical study.
198823
16 200521
17 200720
18 200920
19 199819
20 200919

About Paul Needham

Paul Needham is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Information Systems, Classics and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 134 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (39 papers), History and advancements in chemistry (34 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Research Data Management Practices (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (6 papers), Library Science and Administration (5 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers) and History of Science and Medicine (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (467 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (314 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (179 citations), Philosophy (128 citations) and Classics (39 citations). Paul Needham has collaborated with scholars based in Sweden, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan J. Evans, Lars Lindahl, Barbara A. Wilson, R. F. Atkinson, W. Huw Williams, Prasad Potluri, Robin Findlay Hendry, Barbara A. Wilson, Ann O’Brien and Steve Probets. Their work appears in journals such as The Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Philosophy of Science, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact